Literature DB >> 1462634

Abdominal trauma in war.

D P Rignault1.   

Abstract

In war, the percentage of casualties with abdominal wounds on battlefields is near 20%. Roughly half of these casualties die almost immediately from bleeding. Wounding agents are most often either bullets or fragments from various detonating devices. Severity of pathology induced by these agents and prolonged lag time between injury and treatment constitute major differences between peace and war abdominal injuries. Since the means of diagnosis is unsophisticated in war, penetrating abdominal injury leads to systematic exploratory laparotomy, although 10% to 20% of explorations are negative. The management of colon lesions remains a controversial issue. In modern war surgery manuals, primary colon repair is not totally condemned and is generally considered acceptable, but under stricter criteria than in civilian practice. In abdominal war wounds, mortality rate dropped from 53% during World War I to 18-36% at the end of World War II. In Vietnam it went down near 10% in some limited hospital series. But other data collected during that conflict show a less rosy picture. Of 476 abdominal casualties, the total mortality reached 42%. The hospital mortality among the survivors was 11.5%. Death in cases where abdominal wound was the primary lesion was due to hemorrhage in 60%, sepsis in 25%, and pulmonary insufficiency in 15%. Survivors had an average of 1.8 injured organs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1462634     DOI: 10.1007/bf02066996

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  18 in total

1.  Is war surgery a specialty? Part I.

Authors:  D P Rignault
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 1.437

Review 2.  Principles of management of shotgun wounds.

Authors:  M L Walker; J M Poindexter; I Stovall
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1990-02

3.  Management of the injured colon: evolving practice at an urban trauma center.

Authors:  M A Levison; D D Thomas; R G Wiencek; R F Wilson
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1990-03

4.  Duodenal "diverticulization" for duodenal and pancreatic injury.

Authors:  C J Berne; A J Donovan; E J White; A E Yellin
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Survey of cecal and ascending colon injuries among Vietnam casualties in Japan (1967-1970).

Authors:  E P Quarantillo; G M Nemhauser
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Surgical priorities of abdominal wounded in a combat situation.

Authors:  R R Rozin; Y Kleinman
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1987-06

Review 7.  Management of traumatic retroperitoneal hematoma.

Authors:  D V Feliciano
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Primary repair of the colon: when is it a safe alternative?

Authors:  F L Shannon; E E Moore
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  The 1986 terrorist bombing experience in Paris.

Authors:  D P Rignault; M C Deligny
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Penetrating abdominal trauma index.

Authors:  E E Moore; E L Dunn; J B Moore; J S Thompson
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1981-06
View more
  3 in total

1.  The challenge of military surgical education.

Authors:  Horst Peter Becker; Heinz Gerngross; Robert Schwab
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Management of Destructive Colon Injuries after Damage Control Surgery.

Authors:  Jad Chamieh; Priya Prakash; William J Symons
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-12-19

3.  Abdominal injuries in communal crises: The Jos experience.

Authors:  Emmanuel Olorundare Ojo; Kenneth N Ozoilo; Augustine Z Sule; Benjamin T Ugwu; Michael A Misauno; Bashiru O Ismaila; Solomon D Peter; Adeyinka A Adejumo
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.