Literature DB >> 7230296

Penetrating abdominal trauma index.

E E Moore, E L Dunn, J B Moore, J S Thompson.   

Abstract

A method of quantifying the risk of complication following penetrating abdominal trauma is described. A trauma index score was calculated by assigning a risk factor (1-5) to each organ injured and then multiplying this by a severity of injury estimate (1-5). The sum of the individual organ scores comprised the final penetrating trauma index (P.A.T.I.). A consecutive series from 1975 to 1979 of 108 isolated stab wounds and 114 gunshot wounds to the abdomen requiring laparotomy were analyzed by this scheme. Only patients surviving 24 hours postoperatively were evaluated. Gunshot wounds resulted in P.A.T.I. scores greater than 25 in 39 (34%) of the patients. This was associated with a 46% complication rate and contrasted to a 7% incidence when the P.A.T.I. was equal to or less than 25. Following abdominal stab wounds six (6%) of the patients had P.A.T.I. scores exceeding 25. Complications developed in 50% of this group compared to 5% when the P.A.T.I. was less than 25. Using the P.A.T.I., we conclude that gunshot victims are more likely to need trauma center treatment than those with stab wounds. The P.A.T.I. also might facilitate cost analysis of trauma care. The ability to assess effects of patient age, sex, amount of blood loss, duration of hemodynamic shock, and metabolic response to injury might further enhance the therapeutic implications in both penetrating and blunt abdominal trauma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7230296

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  34 in total

Review 1.  The gastrointestinal immune system: Implications for the surgical patient.

Authors:  Joseph F Pierre; Rebecca A Busch; Kenneth A Kudsk
Journal:  Curr Probl Surg       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 1.909

2.  Lower extremity vascular injuries: increased mortality for minorities and the uninsured?

Authors:  Marie Crandall; Douglas Sharp; Karen Brasel; Mercedes Carnethon; Adil Haider; Thomas Esposito
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Unnecessary laparotomy by using physical examination and different diagnostic modalities for penetrating abdominal stab wounds.

Authors:  C Ertekin; H Yanar; K Taviloglu; R Güloglu; O Alimoglu
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 4.  Scoring and outcome audit systems relevant to emergency medicine.

Authors:  M Waters; P Nightingale
Journal:  Arch Emerg Med       Date:  1990-03

5.  Penetrating Injuries to the Abdomen: a Single Institutional Experience with Review of Literature.

Authors:  B Raj Siddharth; M S S Keerthi; Subrahmaneswara Babu Naidu; M Venkanna
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 0.656

6.  Intraoperative blood salvage in penetrating abdominal trauma: a randomised, controlled trial.

Authors:  Douglas M Bowley; Philip Barker; Kenneth D Boffard
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Comparison of trauma assessment scores and their use in prediction of infection and death.

Authors:  W G Cheadle; M Wilson; M J Hershman; D Bergamini; J D Richardson; H C Polk
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Experiences of Conflict Zone-Related Ballistic Renal Injury.

Authors:  Huseyin Taş; Rahman Şenocak; Şahin Kaymak; Emin Lapsekili
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 0.656

9.  Penetrating duodenal injuries. Analysis of 100 consecutive cases.

Authors:  R R Ivatury; M Nallathambi; J Gaudino; M Rohman; W M Stahl
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Colon trauma: primary repair evolving as the standard of care.

Authors:  J P Muffoletto; J S Tate
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.798

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.