Literature DB >> 14625853

Overcoming technical variation and biological variation in quantitative proteomics.

Mark P Molloy1, Erin E Brzezinski, Junqi Hang, Michael T McDowell, Ruth A VanBogelen.   

Abstract

Quantitative proteomics investigates physiology at the molecular level by measuring relative differences in protein expression between samples under different experimental conditions. A major obstacle to reliably determining quantitative changes in protein expression is to overcome error imposed by technical variation and biological variation. In drug discovery and development the issue of biological variation often rises in concordance with the developmental stage of research, spanning from in vitro assays to clinical trials. In this paper we present case studies to raise awareness to the issues of technical variation and biological variation and the impact this places on applying quantitative proteomics. We defined the degree of technical variation from the process of two-dimensional electrophoresis as 20-30% coefficient of variation. On the other hand, biological variation observed experiment-to-experiment showed a broader degree of variation depending upon the sample type. This was demonstrated with case studies where variation was monitored across experiments with bacteria, established cell lines, primary cultures, and with drug treated human subjects. We discuss technical variation and biological variation as key factors to consider during experimental design, and offer insight into preparing experiments that overcome this challenge to provide statistically significant outcomes for conducting quantitative proteomic research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14625853     DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200300534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteomics        ISSN: 1615-9853            Impact factor:   3.984


  53 in total

1.  Proteomic profiling of cerebrospinal fluid identifies prostaglandin D2 synthase as a putative biomarker for pediatric medulloblastoma: A pediatric brain tumor consortium study.

Authors:  Meena U Rajagopal; Yetrib Hathout; Tobey J MacDonald; Mark W Kieran; Sri Gururangan; Susan M Blaney; Peter Phillips; Roger Packer; Heather Gordish-Dressman; Brian R Rood
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 3.984

2.  Comparison of variability associated with sample preparation in two-dimensional gel electrophoresis of cardiac tissue.

Authors:  Alison M Bland; Louis R D'Eugenio; Melissa A Dugan; Michael G Janech; Jonas S Almeida; Michael R Zile; John M Arthur
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2006-07

3.  Two-dimensional fluorescence difference gel electrophoresis for comparative proteomics profiling.

Authors:  Nilesh S Tannu; Scott E Hemby
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 13.491

4.  A long-term study on female mice fed on a genetically modified soybean: effects on liver ageing.

Authors:  Manuela Malatesta; Federica Boraldi; Giulia Annovi; Beatrice Baldelli; Serafina Battistelli; Marco Biggiogera; Daniela Quaglino
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 4.304

Review 5.  Two-dimensional protein electrophoresis: from molecular pathway discovery to biomarker discovery in neurological disorders.

Authors:  Leila H Choe; Brenda G Werner; Kelvin H Lee
Journal:  NeuroRx       Date:  2006-07

6.  A 90-day safety study of genetically modified rice expressing rhIGF-1 protein in C57BL/6J rats.

Authors:  Maoxue Tang; Tingting Xie; Wenke Cheng; Lili Qian; Shulin Yang; Daichang Yang; Wentao Cui; Kui Li
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2011-09-11       Impact factor: 2.788

7.  Proteomic profiling of early degenerative retina of RCS rats.

Authors:  Zhi-Hong Zhu; Yan Fu; Chuan-Huang Weng; Cong-Jian Zhao; Zheng-Qin Yin
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

8.  Identification and Partial Characterization of Two Populations of Prostasomes by a Combination of Dynamic Light Scattering and Proteomic Analysis.

Authors:  Davide Chiasserini; Michela Mazzoni; Federico Bordi; Simona Sennato; Federica Susta; Pier Luigi Orvietani; Luciano Binaglia; Carlo Alberto Palmerini
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 1.843

9.  Proteomic and bioinformatic profile of primary human oral epithelial cells.

Authors:  Santosh K Ghosh; Elizabeth Yohannes; Gurkan Bebek; Aaron Weinberg; Bin Jiang; Belinda Willard; Mark R Chance; Michael T Kinter; Thomas S McCormick
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 10.  Quality assessment for clinical proteomics.

Authors:  David L Tabb
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 3.281

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.