Literature DB >> 14624910

Probability of biochemical recurrence by analysis of pathologic stage, Gleason score, and margin status for localized prostate cancer.

Masood A Khan1, Alan W Partin, Leslie A Mangold, Jonathan I Epstein, Patrick C Walsh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The Partin tables provide pretreatment information regarding the probability of various pathologic stages (eg, organ confined, extraprostatic extension, and seminal vesicle or lymph node involvement). Although the pathologic stage serves as an excellent surrogate for outcome after radical prostatectomy (RRP), many patients and physicians want to know how the predictions made from the Partin tables can be translated into long-term biochemical recurrence-free survival. In this work, we go beyond the pathologic outcomes predicted by the Partin nomograms to provide long-term biochemical recurrence-free estimates on the basis of the pathologic data obtained at RRP to help counsel patients after surgery for prostate cancer.
METHODS: The study group comprised 1955 men treated by one surgeon with RRP and pelvic lymph node dissection for clinically localized disease (1989 to 2001). The patients were followed up for at least 1 year postoperatively, and the disease-free survival rates were determined using Kaplan-Meier analysis.
RESULTS: The pathologic stages were as follows: organ confined in 57%, extraprostatic extension in 35%, seminal vesicle involvement in 4%, and lymph node involvement in 4%. The prostatectomy Gleason score distribution was as follows: 2 to 4 in 1%, 5 to 6 in 63%, 7 in 30%, and 8 to 10 in 6%. Overall, a positive surgical margin was present in 9.8%. On the basis of the prostatectomy Gleason score, pathologic stage, and surgical margin status, the probability of long-term biochemical recurrence-free survival was divided into four groups: excellent, good, moderate, and low.
CONCLUSIONS: These simple to use and explain risk groups can be used to predict long-term biochemical recurrence-free survival from pathologic stage data obtained at surgery or predicted from the Partin tables, along with surgical margin status and Gleason score information obtained at RRP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14624910     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(03)00674-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  24 in total

Review 1.  Altered metabolism and mitochondrial genome in prostate cancer.

Authors:  G D Dakubo; R L Parr; L C Costello; R B Franklin; R E Thayer
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  [Decreased number of R1-resections in radical retropubic prostatectomy. Use of a newly developed fast sectioning technique].

Authors:  P M Braun; K Meyer-Schell; C Seif; S Hautmann; I Leuschner; G Klöppel; K-P Jünemann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  The emergence of radioimmunoscintigraphy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Thomas E Keane; Inger L Rosner; M Scott Wingo; David G McLeod
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2006

4.  Postprostatectomy risk stratification based on detection of occult lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  Danil V Makarov; Alan W Partin
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2007

5.  Biochemical outcome of small-volume or insignificant prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy in Japanese population.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Hashimoto; Akiko Okamoto; Atsushi Imai; Tohru Yoneyama; Shingo Hatakeyama; Takahiro Yoneyama; Takuya Koie; Noritaka Kaminura; Chikara Ohyama
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  In Organ-confined Prostate Cancer, Tumor Quantitation Not Found to Aid in Prediction of Biochemical Recurrence.

Authors:  Yujiro Ito; Emily A Vertosick; Daniel D Sjoberg; Andrew J Vickers; Hikmat A Al-Ahmadie; Ying-Bei Chen; Anuradha Gopalan; Sahussapont J Sirintrapun; Satish K Tickoo; James A Eastham; Peter T Scardino; Victor E Reuter; Samson W Fine
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 6.394

7.  Salvage radiotherapy for patients with PSA relapse following radical prostatectomy: issues and challenges.

Authors:  Richard Choo
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 4.679

Review 8.  Cancer/testis antigens: novel tools for discerning aggressive and non-aggressive prostate cancer.

Authors:  Takumi Shiraishi; Robert H Getzenberg; Prakash Kulkarni
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 3.285

9.  Prostate cancer knowledge and screening attitudes of inner-city men.

Authors:  John Pendleton; Christopher Hopkins; Satoshi Anai; Kogenta Nakamura; Myron Chang; Anthony Grissett; Charles J Rosser
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.037

10.  Management of prostate cancer patients with locally adverse pathologic features after radical prostatectomy: feasibility of active surveillance for cases with Gleason grade 3 + 4 = 7.

Authors:  Xun Shangguan; Baijun Dong; Yanqing Wang; Fan Xu; Xiaoguang Shao; Jianjun Sha; Yinjie Zhu; Jiahua Pan; Wei Xue
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.