Literature DB >> 14624088

Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of osteoporotic vertebral fracture.

Tsukasa Kanchiku1, Toshihiko Taguchi, Koichiro Toyoda, Kenzo Fujii, Shinya Kawai.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This was a retrospective study of the relation between the blood perfusion of bone marrow in injured vertebrae and the degree of subsequent vertebral collapse in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures.
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate blood perfusion of bone marrow in injured vertebrae using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging and study the possibility of predicting the progression of vertebral collapse. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Avascular necrosis of the vertebra is considered to be a cause of delayed vertebral collapse following osteoporotic vertebral fractures, but studies on the relation with the degree of progression of vertebral collapse by evaluation of vertebral blood perfusion have not been reported.
METHODS: The subjects were 15 vertebrae in 14 patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures, including 11 women and three men with a median age of 79 years. All patients underwent dynamic magnetic resonance imaging soon after the fracture and the area rate of the noncontrast region of the injured vertebrae in dynamic magnetic resonance imaging was measured. The correlation with the degree of progression of vertebral collapse obtained from plain radiograph imaging was studied.
RESULTS: The vertebral collapse rate (percentage loss in vertebral body height) on initial examination was 17 +/- 10% (mean +/- SD) and that at the final examination was 33 +/- 19%, showing a progression of 16 +/- 11%. The noncontrast area rate in dynamic magnetic resonance imaging was 18 +/- 12%. A significant correlation was found between the degree of progression of vertebral collapse and the noncontrast area rate (Spearman r = 0.97, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The subsequent progression of vertebral collapse tended to increase the greater the noncontrast area in the injured vertebrae in dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging appears to be useful in predicting the progression of collapse of fractured vertebrae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14624088     DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000092384.29767.85

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  7 in total

Review 1.  New advances in imaging osteoporosis and its complications.

Authors:  James F Griffith; Harry K Genant
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 2.  Quantitative imaging methods in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Ling Oei; Fjorda Koromani; Fernando Rivadeneira; M Carola Zillikens; Edwin H G Oei
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-12

3.  Osteoporotic vertebral fractures: predictive factors for conservative treatment failure. A systematic review.

Authors:  Marco Muratore; Andrea Ferrera; Alessandro Masse; Alessandro Bistolfi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The impact of preoperative magnetic resonance images on outcome of cemented vertebrae.

Authors:  Wei-Che Lin; Cheng-Hsien Lu; Hsiu-Ling Chen; Hung-Chen Wang; Chun-Yen Yu; Re-Wen Wu; Yu-Fan Cheng; Chun-Chung Lui
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Can MRI predict subsequent pseudarthrosis resulting from osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral fractures?

Authors:  Hirotsugu Omi; Toru Yokoyama; Atsushi Ono; Takuya Numasawa; Kanichiro Wada; Yoichi Fujisawa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Changes in magnetic resonance imaging signal intensity in predicting complications during acute phase osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Keiichiro Iida; Hiromi Kumamaru; Takeyuki Saito; Katsumi Harimaya
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-06-04

7.  The prognosis for pain, disability, activities of daily living and quality of life after an acute osteoporotic vertebral body fracture: its relation to fracture level, type of fracture and grade of fracture deformation.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Suzuki; Osamu Ogikubo; Tommy Hansson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 3.134

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.