Literature DB >> 14623483

Particulate matter in ambient air and mortality: toxicologic perspectives.

Laura C Green1, Sarah R Armstrong.   

Abstract

U.S. regulations that set standards for acceptable concentrations of respirable particulate matter (PM) in outdoor air, particularly total fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)), are based largely on the belief that current concentrations cause death and illness, and that reducing these concentrations will save lives. Because the mortality risk estimates from important observational epidemiologic studies are extremely weak, derived from studies unable to control for relevant confounding causes, and inconsistent by location, toxicologic and clinical information is necessary to judge the likelihood and degree to which such findings are causal. Toxicologic data on typical forms of pollution-derived PM strongly suggest that current ambient concentrations in the U.S. are too small to cause significant disease or death. We review here the results of inhalation studies using concentrated ambient particles, diesel engine exhaust particulate matter, and sulfate and nitrate salts, and find no evidence that moderate concentrations are lethal. The expectation that lives will be saved by reducing ambient PM(2.5) in the U.S. is not supported by the weight of scientific evidence, although other bases for regulating PM may be justifiable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14623483     DOI: 10.1016/s0273-2300(03)00099-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  7 in total

1.  Hormesis for fine particulate matter (PM 2.5).

Authors:  Louis Anthony Tony Cox
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  Temperature, Not Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5), is Causally Associated with Short-Term Acute Daily Mortality Rates: Results from One Hundred United States Cities.

Authors:  Tony Cox; Douglas Popken; Paolo F Ricci
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  Separation and characterization of respirable amphibole fibers from Libby, Montana.

Authors:  James S Webber; David J Blake; Tony J Ward; Jean C Pfau
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.724

4.  In vitro and in vivo assessment of pulmonary risk associated with exposure to combustion generated fine particles.

Authors:  Baher Fahmy; Liren Ding; Dahui You; Slawo Lomnicki; Barry Dellinger; Stephania A Cormier
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.860

5.  Assessment of metal contamination and the associated human health risk from dustfall deposition: a study in a mid-sized town in India.

Authors:  Neha Rani; Bhamidipati S Sastry; Kaushik Dey
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Validation of the dynamic direct exposure method for toxicity testing of diesel exhaust in vitro.

Authors:  Lucky Joeng; Amanda Hayes; Shahnaz Bakand
Journal:  ISRN Toxicol       Date:  2013-08-05

Review 7.  What Are the Net Benefits of Reducing the Ozone Standard to 65 ppb? An Alternative Analysis.

Authors:  Sabine S Lange; Sean E Mulholland; Michael E Honeycutt
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.