| Literature DB >> 23983662 |
Tony Cox1, Douglas Popken, Paolo F Ricci.
Abstract
Exposures to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in air (C) have been suspected of contributing causally to increased acute (e.g., same-day or next-day) human mortality rates (R). We tested this causal hypothesis in 100 United States cities using the publicly available NMMAPS database. Although a significant, approximately linear, statistical C-R association exists in simple statistical models, closer analysis suggests that it is not causal. Surprisingly, conditioning on other variables that have been extensively considered in previous analyses (usually using splines or other smoothers to approximate their effects), such as month of the year and mean daily temperature, suggests that they create strong, nonlinear confounding that explains the statistical association between PM2.5 and mortality rates in this data set. As this finding disagrees with conventional wisdom, we apply several different techniques to examine it. Conditional independence tests for potential causation, non-parametric classification tree analysis, Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA), and Granger-Sims causality testing, show no evidence that PM2.5 concentrations have any causal impact on increasing mortality rates. This apparent absence of a causal C-R relation, despite their statistical association, has potentially important implications for managing and communicating the uncertain health risks associated with, but not necessarily caused by, PM2.5 exposures.Entities:
Keywords: Air pollution health effects; Granger-Sims; J-shaped dose-response curve; PM2.5; cardiovascular disease; causality; conditional independence tests; mortality rates; time series
Year: 2012 PMID: 23983662 PMCID: PMC3748846 DOI: 10.2203/dose-response.12-034.Cox
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dose Response ISSN: 1559-3258 Impact factor: 2.658