Literature DB >> 14622685

The pharmacokinetics of transdermal fentanyl delivered with and without controlled heat.

Michael A Ashburn1, L Lazarre Ogden, Jie Zhang, Georgette Love, Susan V Basta.   

Abstract

Preliminary reports have demonstrated that the application of local heat to the transdermal fentanyl patch significantly increased systemic delivery of fentanyl. The objective of this study was to further evaluate the pharmacokinetic effect of local heat administration on fentanyl drug delivery through the transdermal fentanyl patch delivery system in volunteers. In addition, the study was intended to document the effect of heat on steady-state transdermal fentanyl delivery. This was an open, 3-period, crossover study that evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of 25 microg/h transdermal fentanyl administered with and without local heat. During Sessions A and B, subjects received transdermal fentanyl for a 30-hour period. During Session A, heat was applied for 1 hour at the 24-hour time point during the 30-hour period. During Session B, heat was applied for the first 4 hours and then again for 1 hour at the 24-hour time point during the 30-hour period. The order of Sessions A and B was randomized, and a minimum of 2 weeks separated the sessions. Five of the 10 subjects returned to participate in Session C. During Session C, subjects received transdermal fentanyl 25 microg/h for 18 hours. Heat was applied during the first 4 hours of administration and then again for 15-minute periods at the 12- and 16-hour time points. Arterial blood samples for determination of serum fentanyl concentration were collected. Maximum concentration (C(max)), time to maximum concentration (t(max)), and area under the curve (AUC) were determined for each treatment period. Sedation, vital signs, oxygen saturation, and adverse events were recorded. During a period of 36 hours, there were no significant differences in C(max), AUC, or T(max) between transdermal fentanyl delivery with no heat and heat. However, significant differences were seen during the first 4 hours, with C(max) and AUC values almost 3 times higher for the heated administrations than for the administrations without heat. With heat, the mean C(max) was 0.63 ng/mL compared with a C(max) of 0.24 ng/mL without heat (P =.007). With early heat, the mean AUC was 1.22 ng/mL. h compared with 0.42 ng/mL. h without heat (P =.003). There was no statistically significant difference between the median times to achieve peak values (T(max)) during the first 4 hours. The addition of heat at 24 hours resulted in rapid increases in serum fentanyl concentrations for both groups and higher serum fentanyl concentrations for the administration that did not receive heat previously. Applying heat for 15 minutes at the 12-hour and 16-hour time points produced a rapid but short duration increase in serum fentanyl concentrations. The results suggest controlled heat might be used to significantly shorten the time needed to reach clinically important fentanyl concentrations. Controlled heat might be useful to produce rapid increases in serum concentrations for the rapid treatment of breakthrough pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14622685     DOI: 10.1016/s1526-5900(03)00618-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain        ISSN: 1526-5900            Impact factor:   5.820


  19 in total

1.  Pain recurrence on the third day after application of a transdermal fentanyl patch.

Authors:  Hiroki Konishi; Chie Ishihara; Mikio Chiba; Yoshihiro Endo; Akira Yamaji
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2005-08

2.  Clinical performance of a device that applies local heat to the insulin infusion site: a crossover study.

Authors:  Guido Freckmann; Stefan Pleus; Antje Westhoff; Lars G Krinelke; Andreas Buhr; Nina Jendrike; Cornelia Haug
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-03-01

3.  Equivalence-by-design: targeting in vivo drug delivery profile.

Authors:  Mei-Ling Chen; Vincent H L Lee
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 4.  Health Risks and Interventions in Exertional Heat Stress.

Authors:  Dieter Leyk; Joachim Hoitz; Clemens Becker; Karl Jochen Glitz; Kai Nestler; Claus Piekarski
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 5.  Increasing local blood flow by warming the application site: beneficial effects on postprandial glycemic excursions.

Authors:  Guido Freckmann; Stefan Pleus; Cornelia Haug; Gabriel Bitton; Ron Nagar
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-07-01

6.  The experimental evaluation and molecular dynamics simulation of a heat-enhanced transdermal delivery system.

Authors:  Daniel P Otto; Melgardt M de Villiers
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 3.246

7.  Effect of Controlled Heat Application on Topical Diclofenac Formulations Evaluated by In Vitro Permeation Tests (IVPT) Using Porcine and Human Skin.

Authors:  Sherin Thomas; Soo Hyeon Shin; Dana C Hammell; Hazem E Hassan; Audra L Stinchcomb
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 4.200

8.  Characterization of Temperature Profiles in Skin and Transdermal Delivery System When Exposed to Temperature Gradients In Vivo and In Vitro.

Authors:  Qian Zhang; Michael Murawsky; Terri LaCount; Jinsong Hao; Gerald B Kasting; Bryan Newman; Priyanka Ghosh; Sam G Raney; S Kevin Li
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 9.  A review of factors explaining variability in fentanyl pharmacokinetics; focus on implications for cancer patients.

Authors:  Evelien J M Kuip; Maarten L Zandvliet; Stijn L W Koolen; Ron H J Mathijssen; Carin C D van der Rijt
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-10-29       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 10.  Transdermal fentanyl: pharmacology and toxicology.

Authors:  Lewis Nelson; Robert Schwaner
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2009-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.