Literature DB >> 14620980

Minimally displaced proximal humeral fractures: epidemiology and outcome in 507 cases.

Christian Gaebler1, Margaret M McQueen, Charles M Court-Brown.   

Abstract

We analyzed 507 consecutive minimally displaced proximal humeral fractures and showed that, if the AO classification is used, there is variation in the incidence of minimally displaced fractures in the different AO sub-groups. Patients with Type A minimally displaced fractures are significantly younger than those with Type B or C fractures. 376 patients were followed for 1 year and 88% achieved excellent or good results with nonoperative management. Age was the main determinant of outcome, according to the Neer score and the time taken to return to activities of daily living. Subjectively, older patients felt that the results of treatment were better than the objective measurement of gleno-humeral function would indicate. Many patients with fair or poor results had co-morbidities that prevented a good result. The length of the physiotherapy course affected the outcome at 1 year.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14620980     DOI: 10.1080/00016470310017992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand        ISSN: 0001-6470


  31 in total

Review 1.  Fixed angle locking plates for proximal humeral fracture fixation.

Authors:  S Sinha; C P Kelly
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  [Upper extremity fractures in the elderly].

Authors:  Roland Biber; S Grüninger; H J Bail
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 1.281

3.  [Proximal humerus fracture: new aspects in epidemiology, fracture morphology, and diagnostics].

Authors:  C Hirzinger; M Tauber; H Resch
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Displaced proximal humeral fractures: an Indian experience with locking plates.

Authors:  Sameer Aggarwal; Kamal Bali; Mandeep S Dhillon; Vishal Kumar; Aditya K Mootha
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  [Proximal humerus fracture: is fixed-angle plate osteosynthesis superior to conservative treatment?].

Authors:  C Krettek; U Wiebking
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 6.  The treatment of proximal humeral fracture in adults.

Authors:  Klaus J Burkhart; Sven O Dietz; Leonard Bastian; Ulrich Thelen; Reinhard Hoffmann; Lars P Müller
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 5.594

7.  Treatment of proximal and middle one-third humeral fractures with lateral distal tibial helical plate.

Authors:  Liang Zhang; Lin-Wei Chen; Wen-Jie Zhang; Chun-Ming Zhao; Bo Huang; Qing Yu; Bin Ni
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2011-12-09

Review 8.  ESTES recommendations on proximal humerus fractures in the elderly.

Authors:  Klaus W Wendt; Martin Jaeger; Jan Verbruggen; Stefaan Nijs; Hans-Jörg Oestern; Richard Kdolsky; Radko Komadina
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 3.693

9.  Internal fixation versus nonoperative treatment for displaced 3-part or 4-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Yongchuan Li; Liangyu Zhao; Lei Zhu; Jing Li; Aimin Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Comparison of CFR-PEEK and conventional titanium locking plates for proximal humeral fractures: a retrospective controlled study of patient outcomes.

Authors:  A Padolino; G Porcellini; B Guollo; E Fabbri; G N Kiran Kumar; P Paladini; G Merolla
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2018-10-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.