Literature DB >> 14620365

Boundary distortions for neutral and emotional pictures.

Ingrid Candel1, Harald Merckelbach, Maartje Zandbergen.   

Abstract

In two experiments, we examined Safer, Christianson, Autry, and Osterlund's (1998) claim that when emotional material is remembered, tunnel memory (i.e., the tendency to remember less of a scene than was actually shown) occurs. In Experiment 1, 81 undergraduate students drew photographs from memory after having briefly seen either four neutral or four emotional photographs. Both neutral and emotional drawings revealed boundary extension (i.e., the tendency to remember more of a scene than was actually shown). Experiment 2 relied on the camera distance paradigm (Intraub, Bender, & Mangels, 1992). In a recognition test, 60 undergraduate students judged the camera distance of previously seen neutral or emotional photographs. The majority of them demonstrated accurate judgments and neither extended nor restricted picture boundaries. Those participants who made an error more often displayed a boundary extension than a tunnel memory error. Taken together, our results suggest that boundary extension for neutral and emotional photographs is a more robust phenomenon than its counterpart, tunnel memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14620365     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  7 in total

1.  Wide-angle memories of close-up scenes: a demonstration of boundary extension.

Authors:  C V Gottesman; H Intraub
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  1999-02

2.  Looking at pictures but remembering scenes.

Authors:  H Intraub; R S Bender; J A Mangels
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Wide-angle memories of close-up scenes.

Authors:  H Intraub; M Richardson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Effects of perceiving and imagining scenes on memory for pictures.

Authors:  H Intraub; C V Gottesman; A J Bills
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Boundary extension: fundamental aspect of pictorial representation or encoding artifact?

Authors:  H Intraub; J L Bodamer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 6.  The seven sins of memory. Insights from psychology and cognitive neuroscience.

Authors:  D L Schacter
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1999-03

Review 7.  Emotional stress and eyewitness memory: a critical review.

Authors:  S A Christianson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 17.737

  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  Transsaccadic representation of layout: what is the time course of boundary extension?

Authors:  Christopher A Dickinson; Helene Intraub
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  The role of arousal in boundary judgement errors.

Authors:  Deanne M Green; Jessica A Wilcock; Melanie K T Takarangi
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-07

3.  Boundary Extension in Face Processing.

Authors:  Olesya Blazhenkova
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-09-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.