Literature DB >> 14620287

High ligation to treat pain in varicocele.

Cem Ozden Yeniyol1, Abidin Tuna, Hasan Yener, Nuri Zeyrek, Atilla Tilki.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There are limited data about the effectiveness of surgery in patients with painful varicocele. We report a retrospective study done for the follow up on all varicocele high ligations performed for pain to evaluate the effectiveness of the operations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patients who were all physically active workers and who underwent high inguinal ligation of varicocele for pain from January 1995 to January 2000, were invited for interviews. Their charts were reviewed to document patient age, grade and location of varicocele, duration and quality of pain, response to conservative treatment. All patients who could be contacted were interviewed for resolution of pain and complications, their physical examinations were made.
RESULTS: 87 of 140 (62.1%) patients were available for the follow up. Median patient age was 26 (15 to 34) years old. The varicocele was on the left side in 82 patients and bilateral in 5. The pain was dull in 42, throbbing in 25, sharp in 6 and as a pulling sensation in 14. The longest conservative therapy given in the literature failed in all patients. Varicocele grades were as follows: Grade I in 17, Grade II in 34 and Grade III in 36 patients. High inguinal ligation was used in all patients. 72 (82.8%) patients reported complete resolution, 8 (9.2%) patients reported partial response, 7 (8%) patients had persistant pain.
CONCLUSIONS: High inguinal ligation is effective in the treatment of painful varicocele in highly selected patients. Prospective randomized studies are needed comparing surgical and conservative treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14620287     DOI: 10.1023/a:1025972601213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  9 in total

1.  Effect of microsurgical subinguinal varicocele ligation to treat pain.

Authors:  O Yaman; E Ozdiler; K Anafarta; O Göğüş
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Results of varicocele surgery in adolescents: a comparison of techniques.

Authors:  E J Kass; B Marcol
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Outcomes of varicocele ligation done for pain.

Authors:  A C Peterson; R S Lance; H E Ruiz
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 4.  Male infertility.

Authors:  D M de Kretser
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-03-15       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Response to varicocelectomy in oligospermic men with and without defined genetic infertility.

Authors:  S Cayan; D Lee; L D Black; R A Reijo Pera; P J Turek
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Results obtained from microsurgical therapy of varicocele.

Authors:  H Ito; T Kotake; M Hamano; S Yanagi
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  The painful varicocele.

Authors:  R D Biggers; D W Soderdahl
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 1.437

8.  Relationship between varicocele size and response to varicocelectomy.

Authors:  J Steckel; A P Dicker; M Goldstein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy: a technical critique and statistical analysis of semen and pregnancy data.

Authors:  J L Marmar; Y Kim
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 7.450

  9 in total
  13 in total

1.  Effects of micronised purified flavonoid fraction on pain, semen analysis and scrotal color Doppler parameters in patients with painful varicocele; results of a randomized placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  Haluk Söylemez; Süleyman Kiliç; Murat Atar; Necmettin Penbegül; Ahmet Ali Sancaktutar; Yaşar Bozkurt
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  The hemodynamic approach to evaluating adolescent varicocele.

Authors:  Marcello Cimador; Marco Castagnetti; Ignazio Gattuccio; Marco Pensabene; Maria Sergio; Enrico De Grazia
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Predictors of pain resolution after varicocelectomy for painful varicocele.

Authors:  Hyun Jun Park; Seung Soo Lee; Nam Cheol Park
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 3.285

4.  Orchialgia after laproscopic renal surgery: a common problem with questionable etiology. Are there any predictors?

Authors:  Alok Srivastava; Rakesh Kapoor; Aneesh Srivastava; M S Ansari; Manmeet Singh; Rohit Kapoor
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-04-15       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Painful varicocele in pediatric age: is there a correlation between pain, testicular damage and hormonal values to justify surgery?

Authors:  Nicola Zampieri; Alberto Ottolenghi; Francesco Saverio Camoglio
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 1.827

6.  Varicocelectomy to treat pain, and predictors of success: a prospective study.

Authors:  Mohamed E Abd Ellatif; Waleed Asker; Ashraf Abbas; Ahamed Negm; Mohammed Al-Katary; Haitham El-Kaffas; Ahmed Moatamed
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2012-03-18

Review 7.  Who will benefit from surgical repair for painful varicocele: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Da-Yu Han; Qi-Yun Yang; Xu Chen; Bin Ouyang; Bing Yao; Gui-Hua Liu; Heng Zhang; Kai Xia; Chun-Hua Deng; Xiang-Zhou Sun
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  Does varicocelectomy improve gonadal function in men with hypogonadism and infertility? Analysis of a prospective study.

Authors:  Vasan Sathya Srini; Srinivas Belur Veerachari
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 3.257

9.  Symptomatic male with subclinical varicocele found on ultrasound evaluation.

Authors:  Ahmad Majzoub; Edmund Sabanegh
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

10.  Comparison of laparoscopic and microscopic subinguinal varicocelectomy in terms of postoperative scrotal pain.

Authors:  Haluk Söylemez; Necmettin Penbegül; Murat Atar; Yaşar Bozkurt; Ahmet Ali Sancaktutar; Bülent Altunoluk
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2012 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.