Literature DB >> 24917707

Varicocelectomy to treat pain, and predictors of success: a prospective study.

Mohamed E Abd Ellatif1, Waleed Asker1, Ashraf Abbas1, Ahamed Negm1, Mohammed Al-Katary1, Haitham El-Kaffas1, Ahmed Moatamed1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We attempted to examine the success rate of varicocele ligation when performed for the treatment of pain and to evaluate all the predictor factors that may affect the resolution of pain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2008 to January 2011, a total 152 patients presented with painful varicocele to our out-patient clinic. While waiting for surgery, 7 patients (4.6%) resolved their pain with conservative management and 145 patients underwent varicocelectomy due to failure. The first follow-up visit was after 1 week to check the wounds and 130 patients attended the second visit after 3 months. Follow-up evaluation included physical examination, questioning of pain severity (compared with preoperative pain severity), development of any postoperative complications, and color Doppler to study recurrence reflux.
RESULTS: During the study period, 145/397 (36.5%) patients underwent varicocelectomy for pain. Of the 145 men operated on for pain 130 (89.6%) were available for follow-up. A subinguinal approach was used in 93 patients (71.5%) and high ligation in 37(28.5%). Of the 130 patients contacted after surgery, 109 (83.8%) reported complete resolution of pain, 7 (5.4%) had partial resolution of pain and 14 did not show benefit from surgery. There was no association between varicocele grade, quality of pain, type of varicocele ligation, or recurrence and pain resolution after surgery, only the duration of pain seems to be a factor that is considerably associated with pain resolution.
CONCLUSION: Varicocelectomy is a successful option for treatment of painful varicocele in selected patients. The duration of pain may predict outcomes in these patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Outcome; Pain; Varicocele; Varicocelectomy

Year:  2012        PMID: 24917707      PMCID: PMC3783314          DOI: 10.1159/000338867

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol        ISSN: 1661-7649


  15 in total

1.  Effect of microsurgical subinguinal varicocele ligation to treat pain.

Authors:  O Yaman; E Ozdiler; K Anafarta; O Göğüş
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Results of varicocele surgery in adolescents: a comparison of techniques.

Authors:  E J Kass; B Marcol
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Outcomes of varicocele ligation done for pain.

Authors:  A C Peterson; R S Lance; H E Ruiz
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Microsurgical varicocelectomy for recurrent or persistent varicoceles associated with orchalgia.

Authors:  Ashis Chawla; Girish Kulkarni; Khaled Kamal; Armand Zini
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Duration of preoperative scrotal pain may predict the success of microsurgical varicocelectomy.

Authors:  Bulent Altunoluk; Haluk Soylemez; Erkan Efe; Onder Malkoc
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

6.  Evaluation of the role of varicocelectomy including external spermatic vein ligation in patients with scrotal pain.

Authors:  Kenan Karademir; Temuçin Senkul; Kadir Baykal; Ferhat Ateş; Cüneyd Işeri; Doğan Erden
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.369

7.  Varicocele in childhood and adolescence: implication in adulthood infertility?

Authors:  R P Lyon; S Marshall; M P Scott
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Microsurgical denervation of the spermatic cord: a surgical alternative in the treatment of chronic orchialgia.

Authors:  L A Levine; T G Matkov; T R Lubenow
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Optimizing the outcome of microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy using isosulfan blue: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Christian Schwentner; Josef Oswald; Andreas Lunacek; Martina Deibl; Georg Bartsch; Christian Radmayr
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy: a technical critique and statistical analysis of semen and pregnancy data.

Authors:  J L Marmar; Y Kim
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  The Varicocele: Clinical Presentation, Evaluation, and Surgical Management.

Authors:  Jason R Lomboy; Robert M Coward
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 2.  Who will benefit from surgical repair for painful varicocele: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Da-Yu Han; Qi-Yun Yang; Xu Chen; Bin Ouyang; Bing Yao; Gui-Hua Liu; Heng Zhang; Kai Xia; Chun-Hua Deng; Xiang-Zhou Sun
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Does the number of veins ligated during microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy impact improvement in pain post-surgery?

Authors:  Haitham Elbardisi; Ashok Agarwal; Ahmad Majzoub; Sami Al Said; Hossameldin Alnawasra; Kareim Khalafalla; Khalid Al Rumaihi; Abdulla Al Ansari; Damayanthi Durairaganayagam; Mohamed Arafa
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-04

4.  Microscopic subinguinal varicocelectomy for testicular pain: a retrospective study on outcomes and predictors of pain relief.

Authors:  Abdullah Al-Gadheeb; Hossam S El-Tholoth; Abdulaziz Albalawi; Abdulmajeed Althobity; Mussa AlNumi; Tala Alafraa; Amr Jad
Journal:  Basic Clin Androl       Date:  2021-01-07

Review 5.  A review of varicocele repair for pain.

Authors:  Ryan C Owen; Benjamin J McCormick; Bradley D Figler; Robert M Coward
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-05

Review 6.  Varicocele management for infertility and pain: A systematic review.

Authors:  Scott D Lundy; Edmund S Sabanegh
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2017-12-14

Review 7.  Varicocele and Testicular Pain: A Review.

Authors:  Sunghyun Paick; Woo Suk Choi
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 5.400

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.