Literature DB >> 14620029

Angle-specific impairment of elbow flexors strength after isometric exercise at long muscle length.

Anastassios Philippou1, Maria Maridaki, Gregory C Bogdanis.   

Abstract

In this study, we examined the long-term reductions in maximal isometric force (MIF) caused by a protocol of repeated maximal isometric contractions at long muscle length. Furthermore, we wished to ascertain whether the reductions in MIF are dependent on muscle length--that is, are the reductions in MIF more pronounced when the muscle contracts at a short length. The MIF of the elbow flexors of seven young male volunteers was measured at five different elbow angles between 50 degrees and 160 degrees. On a separate day, the participants performed 50 maximal voluntary isometric muscle contractions with the elbow flexors at a lengthened position; that is, with the shoulder hyperextended at 45 degrees and the elbow joint fixed at 140 degrees. Following this exercise, the MIF at the five elbow angles, range of motion, muscle soreness and plasma creatine kinase activity were measured at 24 h intervals for 4 days. On day 1, the decline in MIF was higher at the more acute elbow angles of 50 degrees (42 +/- 8%) and 70 degrees (39 +/- 8%; both P<0.01) than at 90 degrees (26 +/- 4%) and 140 degrees (16 +/- 3%; both P<0.01). No significant reduction in MIF was evident at an elbow angle of 160 degrees. Maximal isometric force at an elbow angle of 140 degrees was fully restored on day 3, whereas at an angle of 50 degrees it remained depressed for the 4 day observation period. Restoration of MIF was a function of the elbow angle, with force recovery being less at the smaller angles. The range of motion was decreased by 14 +/- 2 degrees on day 1 (P<0.01) and did not return to baseline values by day 4. Muscle soreness ratings remained significantly elevated for the 4 day period. Serum creatine kinase peaked on day 1 (522 +/- 129 IU, P<0.01) and decreased thereafter. We conclude that the disproportionate decrease in MIF at the small elbow angles and the length-specific recovery in MIF after repeated maximal isometric contractions at long muscle length may be explained by the presence of overstretched sarcomeres that increased in series compliance of the muscle, therefore causing a rightward shift of the force-length relationship.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14620029     DOI: 10.1080/0264041031000140356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  11 in total

1.  Changes in the angle-force curve of human elbow flexors following eccentric and isometric exercise.

Authors:  Anastassios Philippou; Gregory C Bogdanis; Alan M Nevill; Maria Maridaki
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-08-04       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  Muscle damage induced by electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Kazunori Nosaka; Abdulaziz Aldayel; Marc Jubeau; Trevor C Chen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Comparison in muscle damage between maximal voluntary and electrically evoked isometric contractions of the elbow flexors.

Authors:  Marc Jubeau; Makii Muthalib; Guillaume Y Millet; Nicola A Maffiuletti; Kazunori Nosaka
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Changes in kinematic variables at various muscle lengths of human elbow flexors following eccentric exercise.

Authors:  Anastassios Philippou; Michael Koutsilieris; Maria Maridaki
Journal:  J Muscle Res Cell Motil       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 2.698

5.  Changes in muscle fiber contractility and extracellular matrix production during skeletal muscle hypertrophy.

Authors:  Christopher L Mendias; Andrew J Schwartz; Jeremy A Grekin; Jonathan P Gumucio; Kristoffer B Sugg
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2016-12-15

6.  Cyclic eccentric stretching induces more damage and improved subsequent protection than stretched isometric contractions in the lower limb.

Authors:  Patricio A Pincheira; Ben W Hoffman; Andrew G Cresswell; Timothy J Carroll; Nicholas A T Brown; Glen A Lichtwark
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Normative values and affecting factors for the elbow range of motion.

Authors:  Elisa L Zwerus; Nienke W Willigenburg; Vanessa A Scholtes; Matthijs P Somford; Denise Eygendaal; Michel Pj van den Bekerom
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2017-09-11

8.  Expression of tissue remodelling, inflammation- and angiogenesis-related factors after eccentric exercise in humans.

Authors:  Anastassios Philippou; Andrea Tryfonos; Apostolos Theos; Adrianos Nezos; Antonis Halapas; Maria Maridaki; Michael Koutsilieris
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 2.316

9.  Validity and Reliability of Elbow Range of Motion Measurements Using Digital Photographs, Movies, and a Goniometry Smartphone Application.

Authors:  Renée Keijsers; Elisa L Zwerus; Dagmar R M van Lith; Koen L M Koenraadt; Pjotr Goossens; Bertram The; Michel P J van den Bekerom; Denise Eygendaal
Journal:  J Sports Med (Hindawi Publ Corp)       Date:  2018-11-29

10.  Effect of a strength or hypertrophy training protocol, each performed using two different modes of resistance, on biomechanical, biochemical and anthropometric parameters.

Authors:  Michał Staniszewski; Andrzej Mastalerz; Czesław Urbanik
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 2.806

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.