Literature DB >> 14620027

The dynamic impact characteristics of tennis balls with tennis rackets.

S J Haake1, M J Carré, S R Goodwill.   

Abstract

The dynamic properties of six types of tennis balls were measured using a force platform and high-speed digital video images of ball impacts on rigidly clamped tennis rackets. It was found that the coefficient of restitution reduced with velocity for impacts on a rigid surface or with a rigidly clamped tennis racket. Pressurized balls had the highest coefficient of restitution, which decreased by 20% when punctured. Pressureless balls had a coefficient of restitution approaching that of a punctured ball at high speeds. The dynamic stiffness of the ball or the ball-racket system increased with velocity and pressurized balls had the highest stiffness, which decreased by 35% when punctured. The characteristics of pressureless balls were shown to be similar to those of punctured balls at high velocity and it was found that lowering the string tension produced a smaller range of stiffness or coefficient of restitution. It was hypothesized that players might consider high ball stiffness to imply a high coefficient of restitution. Plots of coefficient of restitution versus stiffness confirmed the relationship and it was found that, generally, pressurized balls had a higher coefficient of restitution and stiffness than pressureless balls. The players might perceive these parameters through a combination of sound, vibration and perception of ball speed off the racket.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14620027     DOI: 10.1080/0264041031000140329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  6 in total

Review 1.  Modern tennis rackets, balls, and surfaces.

Authors:  S Miller
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Low compression tennis balls and skill development.

Authors:  John Hammond; Christina Smith
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  Joint Kinetics to Assess the Influence of the Racket on a Tennis Player's Shoulder.

Authors:  Thomas Creveaux; Raphaël Dumas; Christophe Hautier; Pierre Macé; Laurence Chèze; Isabelle Rogowski
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  Evolution of mantis shrimp telson armour and its role in ritualized fighting.

Authors:  Jennifer R A Taylor; Nina I Scott; Greg W Rouse
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  The effects of racket inertia tensor on elbow loadings and racket behavior for central and eccentric impacts.

Authors:  Steven M Nesbit; Michael Elzinga; Catherine Herchenroder; Monika Serrano
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

6.  Effects of body mass index and full body kinematics on tennis serve speed.

Authors:  Francis Kh Wong; Jackie Hk Keung; Newman Ml Lau; Douglas Ks Ng; Joanne Wy Chung; Daniel Hk Chow
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 2.193

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.