Literature DB >> 24149804

Joint Kinetics to Assess the Influence of the Racket on a Tennis Player's Shoulder.

Thomas Creveaux1, Raphaël Dumas, Christophe Hautier, Pierre Macé, Laurence Chèze, Isabelle Rogowski.   

Abstract

This study aimed at investigating the influence of three rackets on shoulder net joint moments, power and muscle activity during the flat tennis serve under field- conditions. A 6-camera Eagle(®) motion analysis system, operating at 256 Hz, captured racket and dominant upper limb kinematics of the serve in five tennis players under three racket conditions (A: low mass, high balance and polar moment, B: low three moments of inertia, and C: high mass, swingweight and twistweight). The electromyographic activity of six trunk and arm muscles was simultaneously recorded. Shoulder net joint moments and power were computed by 3D inverse dynamics. The results showed that greater shoulder joint power and internal/external rotation peak moments were found to accelerate and decelerate racket A in comparison with the racket C. Moreover, serving with the racket A resulted in less activity in latissimus dorsi muscle during the acceleration phase, and biceps brachii muscle during the follow-through phase when compared with racket C. These initial findings encourage studying the biomechanical measurements to quantify the loads on the body during play in order to reduce them, and then prevent shoulder injuries. Racket specifications may be a critical point for coaches who train players suffering from shoulder pain and chronic upper limb injuries should be considered in relation to the racket specifications of the players. Key PointsLight racket required more joint power than heavy one to achieve similar post impact ball velocity.Serving with a light racket resulted in higher shoulder internal and external rotation moments than using a heavy one for similar performance.Chronic shoulder pain should encourage coaches to check for potentially inappropriate racket specifications of their players.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EMG; inverse dynamics; joint moment; joint power; tennis serve

Year:  2013        PMID: 24149804      PMCID: PMC3761829     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  22 in total

Review 1.  Overuse injuries of the upper extremity in tennis players.

Authors:  R G Marx; J W Sperling; F A Cordasco
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.182

2.  Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures.

Authors:  H J Hermens; B Freriks; C Disselhorst-Klug; G Rau
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.368

3.  Rotation sequence is an important factor in shoulder kinematics. Application to the elite players' flat serves.

Authors:  A Bonnefoy-Mazure; J Slawinski; A Riquet; J-M Lévèque; C Miller; L Chèze
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Effect of tennis racket parameters on a simulated groundstroke.

Authors:  Tom B Allen; Steve J Haake; Simon R Goodwill
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.337

5.  String vibration dampers do not reduce racket frame vibration transfer to the forearm.

Authors:  F X Li; D Fewtrell; M Jenkins
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.337

6.  The effect of tennis racket grip size on forearm muscle firing patterns.

Authors:  George F Hatch; Marilyn M Pink; Karen J Mohr; Paul M Sethi; Frank W Jobe
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Shoulder joint loading in the high performance flat and kick tennis serves.

Authors:  Machar Reid; Bruce Elliott; Jacque Alderson
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2007-05-18       Impact factor: 13.800

8.  Effects of swing-weight on swing speed and racket power.

Authors:  Rod Cross; Rob Bower
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.337

9.  Relationship between muscle coordination and racket mass during forehand drive in tennis.

Authors:  Isabelle Rogowski; Thomas Creveaux; Aurélien Faucon; Samuel Rota; Stéphane Champely; Aymeric Guillot; Christophe Hautier
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-07-12       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 10.  Upper-limb joint kinetics expression during wheelchair propulsion.

Authors:  Melissa M B Morrow; Wendy J Hurd; Kenton R Kaufman; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2009
View more
  2 in total

1.  Shoulder motion during tennis serve: dynamic and radiological evaluation based on motion capture and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Caecilia Charbonnier; Sylvain Chagué; Frank C Kolo; Alexandre Lädermann
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-12-14       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Effects of the racket polar moment of inertia on dominant upper limb joint moments during tennis serve.

Authors:  Isabelle Rogowski; Thomas Creveaux; Laurence Chèze; Pierre Macé; Raphaël Dumas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.