Literature DB >> 14618363

Reproducibility of brain ADC histograms.

Stefan C A Steens1, Faiza Admiraal-Behloul, Jorrit A Schaap, Frank G C Hoogenraad, Claudia A M Wheeler-Kingshott, Saskia le Cessie, Paul S Tofts, Mark A van Buchem.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of differences in acquisition technique on whole-brain apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram parameters, as well as to assess scan-rescan reproducibility. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) was performed in 7 healthy subjects with b-values 0-800, 0-1000, and 0-1500 s/mm(2) and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) DWI with b-values 0-1000 s/mm(2). All sequences were repeated with and without repositioning. The peak location, peak height, and mean ADC of the ADC histograms and mean ADC of a region of interest (ROI) in the white matter were compared using paired-sample t tests. Scan-rescan reproducibility was assessed using paired-sample t tests, and repeatability coefficients were reported. With increasing maximum b-values, ADC histograms shifted to lower values, with an increase in peak height ( p<0.01). With FLAIR DWI, the ADC histogram shifted to lower values with a significantly higher, narrower peak ( p<0.01), although the ROI mean ADC showed no significant differences. For scan-rescan reproducibility, no significant differences were observed. Different DWI pulse sequences give rise to different ADC histograms. With a given pulse sequence, however, ADC histogram analysis is a robust and reproducible technique. Using FLAIR DWI, the partial-voluming effect of cerebrospinal fluid, and thus its confounding effect on histogram analyses, can be reduced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14618363     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-003-2121-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  33 in total

Review 1.  The effects of microscopic tissue parameters on the diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging experiment.

Authors:  D G Norris
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.044

2.  High-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging of adult brain: image contrast and apparent diffusion coefficient map features.

Authors:  M C DeLano; T G Cooper; J E Siebert; M J Potchen; K Kuppusamy
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the brain: effect of diffusion weighting on trace and anisotropy measurements.

Authors:  E R Melhem; R Itoh; L Jones; P B Barker
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Automated image registration: I. General methods and intrasubject, intramodality validation.

Authors:  R P Woods; S T Grafton; C J Holmes; S R Cherry; J C Mazziotta
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Diffusion changes in the aging human brain.

Authors:  T Chun; C G Filippi; R D Zimmerman; A M Uluğ
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  Imaging modalities in central nervous system systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  T W Huizinga; S C Steens; M A van Buchem
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.006

8.  Cerebral spinal fluid contamination of the measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient of water in acute stroke.

Authors:  Lawrence L Latour; Steven Warach
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of cerebral infarctions: are higher B values better?

Authors:  Jonathan H Burdette; Allen D Elster
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  Diffusion tensor trace mapping in normal adult brain using single-shot EPI technique. A methodological study of the aging brain.

Authors:  Z G Chen; T Q Li; T Hindmarsh
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.701

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  Multicentre imaging measurements for oncology and in the brain.

Authors:  P S Tofts; D J Collins
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in transient ischaemic attacks.

Authors:  C Lamy; C Oppenheim; D Calvet; V Domigo; O Naggara; J L Méder; J L Mas
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-05       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Regional distribution of measurement error in diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  Stefano Marenco; Robert Rawlings; Gustavo K Rohde; Alan S Barnett; Robyn A Honea; Carlo Pierpaoli; Daniel R Weinberger
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 3.222

4.  The effect of corticosteroid medication on quantitative MR parameters of the brain.

Authors:  Stefan C A Steens; Gerda M Steup-Beekman; Gerlof P Th Bosma; Faiza Admiraal-Behloul; Hans Olofsen; Joost Doornbos; Tom W J Huizinga; Mark A van Buchem
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Diffusion characteristics of pediatric pineal tumors.

Authors:  Asim F Choudhri; Matthew T Whitehead; Adeel Siddiqui; Paul Klimo; Frederick A Boop
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2015-05-11

6.  Between-Scanner and Between-Visit Variation in Normal White Matter Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values in the Setting of a Multi-Center Clinical Trial.

Authors:  J Huo; J Alger; H Kim; M Brown; K Okada; W Pope; J Goldin
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.649

7.  Differential diagnosis of normal pressure hydrocephalus by MRI mean diffusivity histogram analysis.

Authors:  M Ivkovic; B Liu; F Ahmed; D Moore; C Huang; A Raj; I Kovanlikaya; L Heier; N Relkin
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Evaluation of white matter damage in patients with Alzheimer's disease and in patients with mild cognitive impairment by using diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  M Ukmar; E Makuc; M L Onor; G Garbin; M Trevisiol; M A Cova
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 3.469

9.  Apparent diffusion coefficient measurements to support a diagnosis of intracranial hypotension.

Authors:  K A Cauley; U Fulwadhva; S K Dundmadappa
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Validation of diffusion MRI phenotypes for predicting response to bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma: post-hoc analysis of the EORTC-26101 trial.

Authors:  Marianne Schell; Irada Pflüger; Gianluca Brugnara; Fabian Isensee; Ulf Neuberger; Martha Foltyn; Tobias Kessler; Felix Sahm; Antje Wick; Martha Nowosielski; Sabine Heiland; Michael Weller; Michael Platten; Klaus H Maier-Hein; Andreas Von Deimling; Martin J Van Den Bent; Thierry Gorlia; Wolfgang Wick; Martin Bendszus; Philipp Kickingereder
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 12.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.