Literature DB >> 14618059

Internal cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation using rectilinear biphasic waveform.

Georges H Mairesse1, Monique Raepers, Isabelle Legrand, Imad Baroud, Yvon Deheneffe, Michel Emonts, Jean-Louis Paquay, Kamal Mitri.   

Abstract

Internal electrical cardioversion is currently used in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation resistant to external electrical cardioversion. In external cardioversion, biphasic waveforms have shown a greater efficacy than monomorphic waveforms. The present study aimed to test the safety and efficacy of rectilinear biphasic waveform in converting patients with persistent atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm using internal electrical cardioversion, and to compare it with that of classical monophasic waveform. Twenty-seven consecutive patients with persistent AF received 31 internal cardioversions, using monophasic waveform in 11 (group I), and rectilinear biphasic waveform in 20 cases (group II). Baseline patients characteristics were similar in both groups. Multipolar catheters were positioned in the distal coronary sinus and in the high right atrium. Synchronised shocks were delivered using an escalating protocol of 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, and 50 Joules. In group I, 1 patient was resistant to maximal energy (success rate 91%). The mean energy of the maximal shock was 18 +/- 13 J. In group II, all patients were converted to sinus rhythm. The mean energy of the maximal shock was 9 +/- 5 J (p < 0.01 vs. group I). No significant complications occurred. At 3 months follow-up, 45% of group I and 60% of group II patients remained in sinus rhythm (p = NS). We conclude that internal cardioversion using rectilinear biphasic waveform is feasible and safe, and requires less energy than classical monophasic waveforms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14618059     DOI: 10.1023/a:1027403729049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  18 in total

Review 1.  Update on external cardioversion and defibrillation.

Authors:  J T Dell'Orfano; G V Naccarelli
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.161

2.  Safety and efficacy of low-energy cardioversion of 500 patients using two different techniques.

Authors:  A Andraghetti; M Scalese
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.214

3.  "Cardioversion" of atrial fibrillation. A report on the treatment of 65 episodes in 50 patients.

Authors:  B LOWN; M G PERLROTH; S KAIDBEY; T ABE; D E HARKEN
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1963-08-15       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Low energy intracardiac cardioversion after failed conventional external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  C Schmitt; E Alt; A Plewan; R Ammer; M Leibig; M Karch; A Schömig
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Prospective randomized trial of external versus internal transcatheter cardioversion in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  K E Paravolidakis; T M Kolettis; G N Theodorakis; I A Paraskevaidis; T S Apostolou; D T Kremastinos
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Low energy internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation resistant to transthoracic shocks.

Authors:  S M Sopher; F D Murgatroyd; A K Slade; I Blankoff; E Rowland; D E Ward; A J Camm
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Internal cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation in patients.

Authors:  R Neri; P Palermo; A S Cesario; D Baragli; E Amici; G Gambelli
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.976

8.  Immediate reinitiation of atrial fibrillation following internal atrial defibrillation.

Authors:  C Timmermans; L M Rodriguez; J L Smeets; H J Wellens
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  1998-02

9.  Multicenter low energy transvenous atrial defibrillation (XAD) trial results in different subsets of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  S Lévy; P Ricard; C P Lau; N S Lok; A J Camm; F D Murgatroyd; L J Jordaens; L J Kappenberger; P Brugada; K L Ripley
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1997-03-15       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  External cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: comparison of biphasic vs monophasic waveform shocks.

Authors:  P Ricard; S Lévy; G Boccara; E Lakhal; G Bardy
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.214

View more
  1 in total

1.  Internal atrial and ventricular defibrillation during electrophysiology procedures.

Authors:  Fred M Kusumoto
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.900

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.