Literature DB >> 9091520

Multicenter low energy transvenous atrial defibrillation (XAD) trial results in different subsets of atrial fibrillation.

S Lévy1, P Ricard, C P Lau, N S Lok, A J Camm, F D Murgatroyd, L J Jordaens, L J Kappenberger, P Brugada, K L Ripley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This prospective, multicenter trial was aimed at defining efficacy and safety of low energy shocks during atrial fibrillation in a diverse cohort of patients.
BACKGROUND: Experimental studies in sheep and preliminary data in humans have suggested that low energy internal shocks delivered between right atrial and coronary sinus electrode catheters may terminate atrial fibrillation.
METHODS: Biphasic 3/3-ms R wave synchronous shocks were delivered between two electrode catheters in the right atrium and coronary sinus. The defibrillation protocol started with a test shock of 20 V, and shocks increased in 40-V steps until restoration of sinus rhythm or a maximum of 400 V. Shock delivery was withheld after short RR intervals. In 141 patients with atrial fibrillation, the protocol was carried out under sedation in case the shock was associated with discomfort. The atrial arrhythmia was paroxysmal (< or = 7 days) in 50 patients, chronic (> 30 days) in 53, intermediate (> 7 days, < or = 30 days) in 18 and induced in 20. Underlying heart disease was present in 88 patients (62%).
RESULTS: Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation was successfully terminated in 46 (92%) of 50 patients, chronic atrial fibrillation in 37 (70%) of 53, intermediate in 16 (89%) of 18 and induced in 16 (80%) of 20. Mean conversion threshold was 1.8 J (213 V) in the induced group, 2.0 J (229 V) in the paroxysmal group, 2.8 J (272 V) in the intermediate group and 3.6 J (311 V) in the chronic group. The conversion voltage was significantly (p < 0.001) higher in the chronic group than in the other groups of atrial fibrillation and increased significantly with the duration of atrial fibrillation and with left atrial size (p < 0.05). Of 1,779 R wave synchronized shocks delivered with a mean (+/-SD) preceding RR interval of 676 +/- 149 ms, no ventricular arrhythmia was induced. The latter may occur after unsynchronized shocks.
CONCLUSIONS: Low energy transvenous shocks in patients with atrial fibrillation are effective and safe, provided that shocks are properly synchronized to R waves with preceding RR intervals that meet appropriate cycle length criteria. This study provides data that may be useful in the development of an implanted atrial defibrillator.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9091520     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(96)00583-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  20 in total

Review 1.  New devices and hybrid therapies and new devices for treatment of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  R B Krol; S Saksena; A Prakash
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Clinical feasibility of low energy internal atrial cardioversion with a three-electrode configuration in patients with unsuccessful conventional configurations.

Authors:  G Benedini; A Gardini; T Toselli; G Antonioli; G Guardigli; G Saccomanno; M Marini
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Atrial defibrillation at the millennium: new challenges for evolving technology.

Authors:  R Boccadamo
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 4.  Optimizing atrial defibrillation.

Authors:  A Prakash; S Saksena
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 5.  New concepts in atrial defibrillation.

Authors:  G M Ayers
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Incidence and modes of onset of early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation after successful internal cardioversion, and its prevention by intravenous sotalol.

Authors:  H F Tse; C P Lau; G M Ayers
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Transvenous cardioversion of atrial fibrillation using low-energy shocks.

Authors:  A G Socas; P Ricard; V Taramasco; M Guenoun; S Lévy
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 8.  Low-energy internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation after failed external cardioversion: Texas Heart Institute experience and review of the literature.

Authors:  M Zaqqa; H Afshar; G R Khoshnevis; J A Lopez; A Massumi
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1999

9.  Prediction of the recurrence of atrial fibrillation after successful cardioversion with P wave signal-averaged ECG.

Authors:  Marco Budeus; Marcus Hennersdorf; Christian Perings; Heinrich Wieneke; Raimund Erbel; Stefan Sack
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 10.  Internal defibrillation: where we have been and where we should be going?

Authors:  Samuel Lévy
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.