Literature DB >> 14617441

A framework for the conceptual modelling of assistive technology device outcomes.

M J Fuhrer1, J W Jutai, M J Scherer, F DeRuyter.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A key step in planning assistive technology outcomes research is formulation of a conceptual model, specific to a particular type of device, that provides a rationale for the expected outcomes. This paper reflects the conviction that the development of device-specific causal models will be facilitated by having available an overarching framework that is potentially applicable to multifarious types of devices and their outcomes.
METHOD: A literature review identified the critical, unmet needs for a conceptual framework. The assumptions underlying the framework were specified preparatory to describing it and discussing its implications.
RESULTS: The outcomes of assistive technology devices are depicted as resulting from the interaction among characteristics of a specific device-type, its users, and their environment. Initial junctures include procurement of a type of device and a period of introductory use that, interacting with various moderating co-factors, result in a variety of shorter-term outcomes, possible longer-term use, and its outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: The framework has the potential of facilitating the development of device-specific causal models. It also may contribute to developing a research agenda for assistive technology outcomes research by highlighting measures that need to be developed and by identifying testable hypotheses concerned, for example, with the manner and duration of devices' usage.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14617441     DOI: 10.1080/09638280310001596207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Rehabil        ISSN: 0963-8288            Impact factor:   3.033


  17 in total

1.  A quality-of-life scale for assistive technology: results of a pilot study of aging and technology.

Authors:  Emily M Agree; Vicki A Freedman
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2011-10-14

2.  [Functional capabilities of users of mobility devices after femoral hip fracture. A comparison study].

Authors:  A Mischker; E Steinhagen-Thiessen
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2010-07-25       Impact factor: 1.281

3.  The association between difficulty using positive airway pressure equipment and adherence to therapy: a pilot study.

Authors:  Constance H Fung; Jennifer L Martin; Uyi Igodan; Stella Jouldjian; Cathy Alessi
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 2.816

4.  Initial constructs for patient-centered outcome measures to evaluate brain-computer interfaces.

Authors:  Elena M Andresen; Melanie Fried-Oken; Betts Peters; Donald L Patrick
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2015-03-25

5.  A study on a shared control navigation system: human/robot collaboration for assisting people in mobility.

Authors:  Francesco Galluppi; Cristina Urdiales; Isabel Sanchez-Tato; Francisco Sandoval; Marta Olivetti Belardinelli
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2009-09

6.  Microswitch programs for persons with multiple disabilities: an overview of the responses adopted for microswitch activation.

Authors:  Giulio E Lancioni; Nirbhay N Singh; Mark F O'Reilly; Doretta Oliva
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2005-07-19

7.  SMARTWheel: From concept to clinical practice.

Authors:  Rory A Cooper
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  Users' satisfaction with assistive devices in South Korea.

Authors:  Sang-Heon Lee
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2014-04-23

9.  Hope and Technology: Other-Oriented Hope Related to Eye Gaze Technology for Children with Severe Disabilities.

Authors:  Patrik Rytterström; Maria Borgestig; Helena Hemmingsson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Informal carers' experience of assistive technology use in dementia care at home: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vimal Sriram; Crispin Jenkinson; Michele Peters
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 3.921

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.