PURPOSE: This study was done to assess the possible clinical value of volume-rendered (VR) and curved volume-rendered (cVR) reconstructions obtained from isotropic data in the diagnosis of atypical appendicitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five patients with suspected acute appendicitis were examined with 16-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) before and after contrast material injection. A diagnosis of atypical appendicitis was made in 33 cases. Two independent blinded radiologists with 2 and 9 years of CT experience assessed the axial scans and 2 months later the VR and cVR reconstructions. The following parameters were considered: presence, location, and wall thickness of the appendix; wall enhancement; distension; periappendiceal fat attenuation; presence of appendicolith; and free air and/or periappendiceal fluid collections. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy values were calculated for each reader. The concordance between the two radiologists was analysed by using Cohen's kappa statistic. RESULTS: Mean sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for the less experienced radiologist were, respectively, 82%, 91% and 84% for the axial scans and 94%, 91% and 93% for the VR and cVR images, whereas the values for the more experienced reader were 94%, 100% and 95% for axial scans, and 97%, 100% and 98% for VR and cVR images. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with atypical appendicitis, VR and cVR reconstructions increase the accuracy of MDCT in relation to the reader's experience and reduce the number of false negative results.
PURPOSE: This study was done to assess the possible clinical value of volume-rendered (VR) and curved volume-rendered (cVR) reconstructions obtained from isotropic data in the diagnosis of atypical appendicitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five patients with suspected acute appendicitis were examined with 16-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) before and after contrast material injection. A diagnosis of atypical appendicitis was made in 33 cases. Two independent blinded radiologists with 2 and 9 years of CT experience assessed the axial scans and 2 months later the VR and cVR reconstructions. The following parameters were considered: presence, location, and wall thickness of the appendix; wall enhancement; distension; periappendiceal fat attenuation; presence of appendicolith; and free air and/or periappendiceal fluid collections. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy values were calculated for each reader. The concordance between the two radiologists was analysed by using Cohen's kappa statistic. RESULTS: Mean sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for the less experienced radiologist were, respectively, 82%, 91% and 84% for the axial scans and 94%, 91% and 93% for the VR and cVR images, whereas the values for the more experienced reader were 94%, 100% and 95% for axial scans, and 97%, 100% and 98% for VR and cVR images. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with atypical appendicitis, VR and cVR reconstructions increase the accuracy of MDCT in relation to the reader's experience and reduce the number of false negative results.
Authors: Vassilios Raptopoulos; Georgia Katsou; Max P Rosen; Bettina Siewert; S Nahum Goldberg; Jonathan B Kruskal Journal: Radiology Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Filippo Cademartiri; Giacomo Luccichenti; Riccardo Marano; Koen Nieman; Nico Mollet; Pim J de Feyter; Gabriel P Krestin; Paolo Pavone; Lorenzo Bonomo Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Filippo Cademartiri; Giacomo Luccichenti; Giuseppe Runza; Massimo Gualerzi; Lorenzo Brambilla; Paolo Coruzzi; Paolo Soliani; Mario Sianesi; Tommaso Vincenzo Bartolotta; Massimo Midiri Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Caroline P Daly; Richard H Cohan; Isaac R Francis; Elaine M Caoili; James H Ellis; Bin Nan Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: J E Jacobs; B A Birnbaum; M Macari; A J Megibow; G Israel; D D Maki; A M Aguiar; C P Langlotz Journal: Radiology Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Pieter Poortman; Paul N M Lohle; Cees M C Schoemaker; Henk J M Oostvogel; Hans J L J M Teepen; Klaas A H Zwinderman; Jaap F Hamming Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 3.959