Literature DB >> 14616130

Safety of rush insect venom immunotherapy. The results of a retrospective study in 178 patients.

J Wenzel1, M Meissner-Kraemer, R Bauer, T Bieber, R Gerdsen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Venom immunotherapy (VIT) is regarded as an established and efficient treatment of Hymenoptera venom allergy. Different frequencies of side-effects have been reported in the literature, depending on the hyposensitization regimen (conventional outpatient programme, rush immunotherapy, ultra rush immunotherapy) and the venom preparation. Aim of this study was to evaluate safety and tolerance of rush VIT in patients treated with a 7-day protocol in our department.
METHODS: VIT protocols of 178 patients treated at the Department of Dermatology and Allergy of the University of Bonn were analysed retrospectively. All patients had been treated with a standardized venom preparations (ALK-SQ). We used a modified VIT-protocol with a 2-day break to reduce systemic side-effects.
RESULTS: During the course of VIT in 15 patients (8.4%) systemic reactions grade I (Mueller scale) were observed, in seven (3.9%) grade II, in six (3.4%) grade III and in four (2.2%) grade IV. A total of 146 patients (82.1%) had no or only local reactions.
CONCLUSIONS: The rate of systemic adverse reactions Mueller Grade I-IV of 17.9% of the 'Bonn rush VIT protocol' appears to be relatively low compared with the data in the literature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14616130     DOI: 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2003.00268.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Allergy        ISSN: 0105-4538            Impact factor:   13.146


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Allergen-specific Immunotherapy for children and adolescents - a review on available products in Austria].

Authors:  Zsolt Szépfalusi; Waltraud Emminger; Franz Eitelberger; Manfred Götz; Andrea Grillenberger; Elisabeth Horak; Isidor Huttegger; Dieter Koller; Helmut Litscher; Rudolf Schmitzberger; Eva-Maria Varga; Josef Riedler
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 2.  Clinical practice: Allergen-specific immunotherapy in children: facts and FAQs.

Authors:  Zsolt Szépfalusi; Saskia Gruber; Thomas Eiwegger; Eleonora Dehlink
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 3.183

3.  Induction of specific immunotherapy with hymenoptera venoms using ultrarush regimen in children: safety and tolerance.

Authors:  Alice Köhli-Wiesner; Lisbeth Stahlberger; Christian Bieli; Tamar Stricker; Roger Lauener
Journal:  J Allergy (Cairo)       Date:  2011-07-19

4.  Safety and efficacy of venom immunotherapy: a real life study.

Authors:  Agnieszka Kołaczek; Dawid Skorupa; Monika Antczak-Marczak; Piotr Kuna; Maciej Kupczyk
Journal:  Postepy Dermatol Alergol       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 1.837

5.  Safety and tolerability of venom immunotherapy: Evaluation of 581 rush- and ultra-rush induction protocols (safety of rush and ultra-rush venom immunotherapy).

Authors:  Richard Stock; Tatjana Fischer; Katharina Aẞmus; Nadja Zoeller; Hanns Ackermann; Roland Kaufmann; Markus Meissner; Eva Valesky
Journal:  World Allergy Organ J       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 4.084

Review 6.  [Venom immunotherapy. Side effects and efficacy of treatment].

Authors:  F Ruëff; B Przybilla
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.198

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.