Literature DB >> 14615428

Limb position drift: implications for control of posture and movement.

Liana E Brown1, David A Rosenbaum, Robert L Sainburg.   

Abstract

In the absence of visual feedback, subject reports of hand location tend to drift over time. Such drift has been attributed to a gradual reduction in the usefulness of proprioception to signal limb position. If this account is correct, drift should degrade the accuracy of movement distance and direction over a series of movements made without visual feedback. To test this hypothesis, we asked participants to perform six series of 75 repetitive movements from a visible start location to a visible target, in time with a regular, audible tone. Fingertip position feedback was given by a cursor during the first five trials in the series. Feedback was then removed, and participants were to continue on pace for the next 70 trials. Movements were made in two directions (30 degrees and 120 degrees ) from each of three start locations (initial shoulder angles of 30 degrees, 40 degrees, 50 degrees, and initial elbow angles of 90 degrees ). Over the 70 trials, the start location of each movement drifted, on average, 8 cm away from the initial start location. This drift varied systematically with movement direction, indicating that drift is related to movement production. However, despite these dramatic changes in hand position and joint configuration, movement distance and direction remained relatively constant. Inverse dynamics analysis revealed that movement preservation was accompanied by substantial modification of joint muscle torque. These results suggest that proprioception continues to be a reliable source of limb position information after prolonged time without vision, but that this information is used differently for maintaining limb position and for specifying movement trajectory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14615428     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00013.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  53 in total

1.  Movement speed effects on limb position drift.

Authors:  Liana E Brown; David A Rosenbaum; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  How perceived egocentric distance varies with changes in tonic vergence.

Authors:  Anne-Emmanuelle Priot; Pascaline Neveu; Olivier Sillan; Justin Plantier; Corinne Roumes; Claude Prablanc
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Differential influence of vision and proprioception on control of movement distance.

Authors:  Leia B Bagesteiro; Fabrice R Sarlegna; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The effect of target modality on visual and proprioceptive contributions to the control of movement distance.

Authors:  Fabrice R Sarlegna; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Sensory integration does not lead to sensory calibration.

Authors:  Jeroen B J Smeets; John J van den Dobbelsteen; Denise D J de Grave; Robert J van Beers; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-27       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The cerebellum contributes to proprioception during motion.

Authors:  Heidi M Weeks; Amanda S Therrien; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Brain-state classification and a dual-state decoder dramatically improve the control of cursor movement through a brain-machine interface.

Authors:  Nicholas A Sachs; Ricardo Ruiz-Torres; Eric J Perreault; Lee E Miller
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 8.  The kinaesthetic senses.

Authors:  Uwe Proske; Simon C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-07-06       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Pitch and space maps of skilled cellists: accuracy, variability, and error correction.

Authors:  Jessie Chen; Marjorie H Woollacott; Steven Pologe; George P Moore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-19       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Judgements of hand location and hand spacing show minimal proprioceptive drift.

Authors:  Alex Rana; Annie A Butler; Simon C Gandevia; Martin E Héroux
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.