Literature DB >> 14615080

Differential modulation of corticospinal excitability during observation, mental imagery and imitation of hand actions.

Shannon Clark1, François Tremblay, Diane Ste-Marie.   

Abstract

In this study, we attempted to better delineate the changes in corticospinal excitability that accompany perceptual to motor transformations when people are asked to observe, image or imitate actions. Motor evoked potentials (MEP) from transcranial magnetic stimulation were recorded in the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle of the dominant hand (15 right, 4 left) in five different conditions: (1) passive observation; (2) observation to imitate; (3) imagery; (4) imitation; and (5) counting backwards mentally. MEPs were also recorded at rest at the beginning and at the end of the session to establish baseline (BL) values. For the observation conditions, participants (n=19, 18-38 years) watched video sequences (5s) of hand actions performed by a model with the right arm (passive observation: scissors; observation to imitate: OK sign). Active imitation produced the greatest MEP facilitation compared to baseline, followed by the two observation conditions and the imagery conditions, which all produced similar levels of facilitation (post hoc comparisons). Mental counting produced some facilitation, but this effect was inconsistent. Baseline MEPs remained stable at the end of the session. A further comparison between right-handers (n=15) and left-handers (n=4) revealed no difference in the pattern of modulation across conditions. The similarity found between observation and imagery of hand actions in terms of corticospinal facilitation is interpreted in the light of the motor-simulation theory of Jeannerod [Neuroimage 14 (2001)], which proposes that perceiving actions involves neural simulation of the same action by the observer, thereby explaining the parallel between actions observed and actions imaged at the representational level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14615080     DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(03)00144-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  55 in total

1.  In the absence of physical practice, observation and imagery do not result in updating of internal models for aiming.

Authors:  Nicole T Ong; Beverley C Larssen; Nicola J Hodges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Modulation of the response to a somatosensory stimulation of the hand during the observation of manual actions.

Authors:  Julien I A Voisin; Erika C Rodrigues; Sébastien Hétu; Philip L Jackson; Claudia D Vargas; Francine Malouin; C Elaine Chapman; Catherine Mercier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Self-selected conscious strategies do not modulate motor cortical output during action observation.

Authors:  Katherine R Naish; Sukhvinder S Obhi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Neural representations involved in observed, imagined, and imitated actions are dissociable and hierarchically organized.

Authors:  Kristen L Macuga; Scott H Frey
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-10-08       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Corticomotor facilitation associated with observation, imagery and imitation of hand actions: a comparative study in young and old adults.

Authors:  Guillaume Léonard; François Tremblay
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Action observation improves motor imagery: specific interactions between simulative processes.

Authors:  Massimiliano Conson; Marco Sarà; Francesca Pistoia; Luigi Trojano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Motor excitability during imagination and observation of foot dorsiflexions.

Authors:  Joachim Liepert; Nina Neveling
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.575

8.  The perception-action dynamics of action competency are altered by both physical and observational training.

Authors:  John J Buchanan; Jorge Ramos; Nina Robson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-25       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  (Lack of) Corticospinal facilitation in association with hand laterality judgments.

Authors:  Lucas Ferron; François Tremblay
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-05-06       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 10.  Weaving the fabric of social interaction: articulating developmental psychology and cognitive neuroscience in the domain of motor cognition.

Authors:  Jessica A Sommerville; Jean Decety
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.