Literature DB >> 28478575

(Lack of) Corticospinal facilitation in association with hand laterality judgments.

Lucas Ferron1, François Tremblay2,3.   

Abstract

In recent years, mental practice strategies have drawn much interest in the field of rehabilitation. One form of mental practice particularly advocated involves judging the laterality of images depicting body parts. Such laterality judgments are thought to rely on implicit motor imagery via mental rotation of one own's limb. In this study, we sought to further characterize the involvement of the primary motor cortex (M1) in hand laterality judgments (HLJ) as performed in the context of an application designed for rehabilitation. To this end, we measured variations in corticospinal excitability in both hemispheres with motor evoked potentials (MEPs) while participants (n = 18, young adults) performed either HLJ or a mental counting task. A third condition (foot observation) provided additional control. We hypothesized that HLJ would lead to a selective MEP facilitation when compared to the other tasks and that this facilitation would be greater on the right than the left hemisphere. Contrary to our predictions, we found no evidence of task effects and hemispheric effects for the HLJ task. Significant task-related MEP facilitation was detected only for the mental counting task. A secondary experiment performed in a subset of participants (n = 6) to further test modulation during HLJ yielded the same results. We interpret the lack of facilitation with HLJ in the light of evidence that participants may rely on alternative strategies when asked to judge laterality when viewing depictions of body parts. The use of visual strategies notably would reduce the need to engage in mental rotation, thus reducing M1 involvement. These results have implications for applications of laterality tasks in the context of the rehabilitation program.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laterality task; Mental rotation; Motor evoked potentials; Motor imagery; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28478575     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-4973-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  40 in total

1.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation of primary motor cortex affects mental rotation.

Authors:  G Ganis; J P Keenan; S M Kosslyn; A Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  A safety screening questionnaire for transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  J C Keel; M J Smith; E M Wassermann
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 3.  Higher-level motor processes.

Authors:  Raffaella Ida Rumiati; Liuba Papeo; Corrado Corradi-Dell'Acqua
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Contribution of hand motor circuits to counting.

Authors:  Michael Andres; Xavier Seron; Etienne Olivier
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Neural correlates of two imagined egocentric transformations.

Authors:  Sarah H Creem-Regehr; Jayson A Neil; Hsiang J Yeh
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-12-16       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 6.  Motor imagery and cortico-spinal excitability: A review.

Authors:  Sidney Grosprêtre; Célia Ruffino; Florent Lebon
Journal:  Eur J Sport Sci       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 4.050

7.  Kinesthetic aspects of mental representations in the identification of left and right hands.

Authors:  K Sekiyama
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-08

8.  Task-dependent interaction between parietal and contralateral primary motor cortex during explicit versus implicit motor imagery.

Authors:  Florent Lebon; Martin Lotze; Cathy M Stinear; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Different strategies do not moderate primary motor cortex involvement in mental rotation: a TMS study.

Authors:  Stefan Bode; Susan Koeneke; Lutz Jäncke
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 3.759

Review 10.  Towards the integration of mental practice in rehabilitation programs. A critical review.

Authors:  Francine Malouin; Philip L Jackson; Carol L Richards
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  4 in total

1.  The TMS Motor Map Does Not Change Following a Single Session of Mirror Training Either with Or without Motor Imagery.

Authors:  Mark van de Ruit; Michael J Grey
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Motor imagery training induces changes in brain neural networks in stroke patients.

Authors:  Fang Li; Tong Zhang; Bing-Jie Li; Wei Zhang; Jun Zhao; Lu-Ping Song
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.135

3.  Clinical and Electrophysiological Hints to TMS in De Novo Patients with Parkinson's Disease and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy.

Authors:  Francesco Fisicaro; Giuseppe Lanza; Mariagiovanna Cantone; Raffaele Ferri; Giovanni Pennisi; Alessandra Nicoletti; Mario Zappia; Rita Bella; Manuela Pennisi
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2020-12-12

4.  Performing the hand laterality judgement task does not necessarily require motor imagery.

Authors:  Akira Mibu; Shigeyuki Kan; Tomohiko Nishigami; Yuji Fujino; Masahiko Shibata
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.