Literature DB >> 14614940

Straining of the intact and fractured proximal humerus under physiological-like loading.

Zully M Maldonado1, Jörn Seebeck, Markus O W Heller, Doris Brandt, Pierre Hepp, Helmut Lill, Georg N Duda.   

Abstract

Surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures remains challenging in elderly patients, primarily due to insufficient implant fixation. Both bone quality and physiological-like loading conditions are commonly overlooked during pre-clinical in vitro evaluation. However, this knowledge is necessary in order to improve surgical treatment of the proximal humerus and the mechanical behavior of implants, particularly in patients with complex fractures and weak bone stock. We hypothesize that the bone quality has a high influence on the bone straining, independent of the arm position. The goal of this study was to determine the straining of the intact and fractured proximal humerus under physiological-like loading conditions. Furthermore, the impact of augmentation on tissue straining was evaluated. Two representative humeri were selected for this study, one osteoporotic and one reference quality, and scanned using both QCT and DEXA (average DEXA value=0.26 and 0.49 g/cm2 respectively). Subcaptial defects were generated, then stabilized with a plate prior to mechanical stiffness testing. From the QCT data, finite element models were generated and the in vitro stiffness tests analytically simulated. Under physiological-like loading conditions, the straining of the bone and implant were analyzed for 0 degrees, 90 degrees forward flexion, and 90 degrees abduction. Maximal strain values were found for the intact and fractured bone at 90 degrees abduction. This study demonstrates that the straining in a fractured bone of poor quality leads to considerably higher bone strains (up to +30%) than in a more healthy bone. Augmentation of a central void under physiological-like loading with commercial cement led to mechanical failure at the bone-cement interface. New concepts for the surgical treatment of complex fractures of the proximal humerus should take bone distribution into account and thereby allow effective treatment of fractures in osteoporotic patients. The ultimate salvage procedure of augmentation has mechanical limitations as long as current cement materials are used in osteoporotic patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14614940     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(03)00212-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  10 in total

1.  Finite element analysis of the strain distribution in the humeral head tubercles during abduction: comparison of young and osteoporotic bone.

Authors:  Ph Clavert; M Zerah; J Krier; P Mille; J F Kempf; J L Kahn
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2006-08-26       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Locking screw-plate interface stability in carbon-fibre reinforced polyetheretherketone proximal humerus plates.

Authors:  David J Hak; Ryan Fader; Todd Baldini; Vivek B S Chadayammuri
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Numerical investigation of fracture impaction in proximal humeral fracture fixation with locking plate and intramedullary nail.

Authors:  Yen-Nien Chen; Chih-Wei Chang; Chia-Wei Lin; Chih-Wei Wang; Yao-Te Peng; Chih-Han Chang; Chun-Ting Li
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Refixation stability in shoulder hemiarthroplasty in case of four-part proximal humeral fracture.

Authors:  Daniel Baumgartner; Silvio René Lorenzetti; Robert Mathys; Beat Gasser; Edgar Stüssi
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 5.  The Applications of Finite Element Analysis in Proximal Humeral Fractures.

Authors:  Yongyu Ye; Wei You; Weimin Zhu; Jiaming Cui; Kang Chen; Daping Wang
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2017-09-10       Impact factor: 2.238

Review 6.  Biomechanical analysis of plate systems for proximal humerus fractures: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Ali Jabran; Chris Peach; Lei Ren
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 7.  Carbon Fiber Implants in Orthopaedic Oncology.

Authors:  Caleb M Yeung; Abhiram R Bhashyam; Shalin S Patel; Eduardo Ortiz-Cruz; Santiago A Lozano-Calderón
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 8.  Finite Element Analysis of Fracture Fixation.

Authors:  Gregory S Lewis; Dominic Mischler; Hwabok Wee; J Spence Reid; Peter Varga
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 5.163

9.  Straight proximal humeral nails are surrounded by more bone stock in comparison to bent nails in an experimental cadaveric study.

Authors:  Christian Max Günther; Peter Ernst Müller; Wolf Mutschler; Christoph Martin Sprecher; Stefan Milz; Volker Braunstein
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2014-04-22

10.  Biomechanical evaluation of a new gliding screw concept for the fixation of proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Y P Acklin; I Zderic; J A Inzana; S Grechenig; R Schwyn; R G Richards; B Gueorguiev
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2018-07-07       Impact factor: 5.853

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.