Literature DB >> 14613240

Pore size in implanted polypropylene filters is critical for tissue organization.

Agneta Rosengren1, Lars Magnus Bjursten.   

Abstract

Widely different implant materials induce surprisingly similar tissue reactions in vivo in contrast to their in vitro responses. Increasing attention has recently been given to the surface texture of the material. When both the material composition and the surface topography are varied, the surface topography seems to be the predominant factor for the induced tissue response. The present study addresses differences in the tissue response to commercially available Millipore mesh filters of polypropylene with pore sizes of 0.6, 10.0 or 30.0 microm. The Millipore filters with adjacent tissue were directly sectioned in a cryostat and evaluated via an immunofluorescence technique with double and triple staining, allowing simultaneous analysis of different antigens in tissue sections. These results show that macrophages, total cells, necrotic cells, nitric oxygen distribution, early angiogenesis, and capsule thickness were influenced by the surface structure. Implants with pore sizes of 0.6 microm, where entrance of inflammatory cells was inhibited, induce the most pronounced foreign body capsule formation. The 10- and 30-microm filters, in contrast, had large amounts of macrophages inside the filter structure, although very few inflammatory cells were found outside the filters. The inflammatory cells within the filters appeared not to influence the foreign body capsule induction. The critical factor for the formation of a foreign body capsule seems to be the localization of implant-close macrophages. Whether this is due to differences in cell activation or in signal transduction to collagen-synthesizing fibroblasts remains an open question. Copyright 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 67A: 918-926, 2003

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14613240     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.10509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A        ISSN: 1549-3296            Impact factor:   4.396


  6 in total

1.  Senescence and quiescence induced compromised function in cultured macrophages.

Authors:  Dolly J Holt; David W Grainger
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  Altering spacer material affects bone regeneration in the Masquelet technique in a rat femoral defect.

Authors:  Sarah McBride-Gagyi; Zacharie Toth; Daniel Kim; Victoria Ip; Emily Evans; John Tracy Watson; Daemeon Nicolaou
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Comment to: Characterization of host response, resorption, and strength properties, and performance in the presence of bacteria for fully absorbable biomaterials for soft tissue repair. Stoikes NFN, Scott J, Badhwar A, Deeken C, Voeller G.

Authors:  M P Gosselink; D B Wright; G Ctercteko
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 4.  Medical Applications of Porous Biomaterials: Features of Porosity and Tissue-Specific Implications for Biocompatibility.

Authors:  Jamie L Hernandez; Kim A Woodrow
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 11.092

5.  The Possibility of Using Bioprostheses for Autoplasty of Skull Bone Defects (an Experimental Study).

Authors:  N V Tуumentseva; Yu S Khramtsova; O S Artashyan; B G Yushkov
Journal:  Bull Exp Biol Med       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 0.804

6.  Evaluation of Angiogenesis in an Acellular Porous Biomaterial Based on Polyhydroxybutyrate and Chitosan Using the Chicken Ex Ovo Chorioallantoic Membrane Model.

Authors:  Zuzana Demcisakova; Lenka Luptakova; Zuzana Tirpakova; Alena Kvasilova; Lubomir Medvecky; Ward De Spiegelaere; Eva Petrovova
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 6.575

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.