Literature DB >> 14612946

Considerations on development, validation, application, and quality control of immuno(metric) biomarker assays in clinical cancer research: an EORTC-NCI working group report.

Fred C G J Sweep1, Herbert A Fritsche, Massimo Gion, George G Klee, Manfred Schmitt.   

Abstract

A major dilemma associated with immuno(metric) assays for biomarkers is that various kits employing antibodies with differing specificities and binding affinities may generate non-equivalent test results. Also, variation in sample processing and the use of different standards (reference material) may result in discordant test results. Therefore, assays and procedures should be standardized and the quality of biomarker assay results should be monitored by continuous between-laboratory proficiency testing of performance. External quality control requires an established network of expert laboratories in which the investigators interact freely and where technical issues are discussed. Although such networking is more often praised than practiced, we strongly endorse and advocate between-laboratory exchange of experience and information. The present study discusses analytical aspects of immuno(metric) biomarker assays and presents recommendations of the Receptor and Biomarker Group of the EORTC (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer) how such tests should be validated for first time and day to day use. Moreover, a model for an appropriate quality assurance program is presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14612946

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oncol        ISSN: 1019-6439            Impact factor:   5.650


  5 in total

1.  Prospective Biomarker Trials Chemo N0 and NNBC-3 Europe Validate the Clinical Utility of Invasion Markers uPA and PAI-1 in Node-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Nadia Harbeck; Manfred Schmitt; Martina Vetter; Janna Krol; Daniela Paepke; Mathias Uhlig; Stefan Paepke; Fritz Jänicke; Anneke Geurts-Moespot; Gunter von Minckwitz; Fred Sweep; Christoph Thomssen
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 2.  Banking of biological fluids for studies of disease-associated protein biomarkers.

Authors:  Anne-Sofie Schrohl; Sidse Würtz; Elise Kohn; Rosamonde E Banks; Hans Jørgen Nielsen; Fred C G J Sweep; Nils Brünner
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Identification of clinical biomarkers for pre-analytical quality control of blood samples.

Authors:  Hyun Ju Kang; Soon Young Jeon; Jae-Sun Park; Ji Young Yun; Han Na Kil; Won Kyung Hong; Mee-Hee Lee; Jun-Woo Kim; Jae-Pil Jeon; Bok Ghee Han
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Stability of [-2]Pro-PSA in whole blood and serum: analysis for optimal measurement conditions.

Authors:  Tsukasa Igawa; Kosuke Takehara; Toru Onita; Kazuto Ito; Hideki Sakai
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 2.352

5.  A Microfluidic Immunostaining System Enables Quality Assured and Standardized Immunohistochemical Biomarker Analysis.

Authors:  Seyong Kwon; Chang Hyun Cho; Youngmee Kwon; Eun Sook Lee; Je-Kyun Park
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.