Literature DB >> 1461202

A finite-size pencil beam model for photon dose calculations in three dimensions.

J D Bourland1, E L Chaney.   

Abstract

A three-dimensional dose computation model employing a finite-size, diverging, pencil beam has been developed and is demonstrated for Cobalt-60 gamma rays. The square cross-section pencil beam is simulated in a semi-infinite water phantom by convolving the pencil beam photon fluence with the Monte Carlo point dose kernel for Cobalt-60. This finite-size pencil beam is calculated one time and becomes a new data base with which to build larger beams by two-dimensional superposition. The pencil beam fluence profile, angle correction for beam divergence, the Mayneord inverse square correction, radial and angular sampling rates, error propagation, and computation time have been investigated and are reported. Radial and angular sampling rates have a great effect on accuracy and their appropriate selection is important. Percent depth doses calculated by finite-size pencil beam superposition are within 1% of values calculated by full convolution and the agreement with values from the literature is within 6%. The latter disagreement is shown to be due to a low-energy photon component which is not modeled in other calculations. Computation time measurements show the pencil beam method to be faster than full convolution and one implementation of the differential-scatter-air-ratio (dSAR) method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1461202     DOI: 10.1118/1.596772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  4 in total

1.  Technical note: Heterogeneity dose calculation accuracy in IMRT: study of five commercial treatment planning systems using an anthropomorphic thorax phantom.

Authors:  Scott E Davidson; Richard A Popple; Geoffrey S Ibbott; David S Followill
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Introducing matrix sparsity with kernel truncation into dose calculations for fluence optimization.

Authors:  Hunter Stephens; Q Jackie Wu; Qiuwen Wu
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2021-11-12

3.  Boosting radiotherapy dose calculation accuracy with deep learning.

Authors:  Yixun Xing; You Zhang; Dan Nguyen; Mu-Han Lin; Weiguo Lu; Steve Jiang
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Comparison of dose calculated by an intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning system and an independent monitor unit verification program.

Authors:  J J Haslam; D V Bonta; A E Lujan; C Rash; W Jackson; J C Roeske
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.102

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.