Literature DB >> 1461169

Assessing clinical competence at the undergraduate level.

D I Newble1.   

Abstract

This booklet aims to provide relevant background information and guidelines for medical school teachers in clinical departments charged with assessing the clinical competence of undergraduate students. It starts by emphasizing the difference between clinical competence and clinical performance. An approach to defining what should be assessed is outlined. The technical considerations of validity, reliability and practicability are discussed with reference to the ward- or practice-based setting and to the examination setting. The various methods available to assess aspects of competence are described and their strengths and weaknesses reviewed. The paper concludes with a discussion of the important issues of scoring and standard setting. The conclusion is reached that the quality of many current assessments could be improved. To do so will require a multi-format approach using both the practice and examination settings. Some of the traditional methods will have to be abandoned or modified and new methods introduced.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1461169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  6 in total

1.  Medical students' compliance with simple administrative tasks and success in final examinations: retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Neil Wright; M S Tanner
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-06-29

2.  Improving in-training evaluation programs.

Authors:  J Turnbull; J Gray; J MacFadyen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Comparing Objective Structured Clinical Examinations and Traditional Clinical Examinations in the Summative Evaluation of Final-Year Medical Students.

Authors:  Balantine Ugochukwu N Eze; Anthony Jude Edeh; Anthony Ikemefuna Ugochukwu
Journal:  Niger J Surg       Date:  2020-07-27

4.  Using the Ages and Stages Questionnaire to teach medical students developmental assessment: a descriptive analysis.

Authors:  Pam Nicol
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2006-05-22       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Validation of a new instrument for self-assessment of nurses' core competencies in palliative care.

Authors:  Kari Slåtten; Ove Hatlevik; Lisbeth Fagerström
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2014-07-16

6.  Perceived educational impact of the medical student long case: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Corinne Tey; Neville Chiavaroli; Anna Ryan
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 2.463

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.