Literature DB >> 14609170

Safety and efficacy of convection-enhanced delivery of gemcitabine or carboplatin in a malignant glioma model in rats.

Jeffrey W Degen1, Stuart Walbridge, Alexander O Vortmeyer, Edward H Oldfield, Russell R Lonser.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) can be used safely to perfuse regions of the central nervous system (CNS) with therapeutic agents in a manner that bypasses the blood-brain barrier (BBB). These features make CED a potentially ideal method for the distribution of potent chemotherapeutic agents with certain pharmacokinetic properties to tumors of the CNS. To determine the safety and efficacy of the CED of two chemotherapeutic agents (with properties ideal for this method of delivery) into the CNS, the authors perfused naive rats and those harboring 9L gliomas with carboplatin or gemcitabine.
METHODS: Dose-escalation toxicity studies were performed by perfusing the striatum (10 microl, 24 rats) and brainstem (10 microl, 16 rats) of naive rats with carboplatin (0.1, 1, and 10 mg/ml) or gemcitabine (0.4, 4, and 40 mg/ml) via CED. Efficacy trials involved the intracranial implantation of 9L tumor cells in 20 Fischer 344 rats. The tumor and surrounding regions were perfused with 40 microl of saline (control group, four rats), 1 mg/ml of carboplatin (four rats), or 4 mg/ml of gemcitabine (four rats) 7 days after implantation. Eight rats harboring the 9L glioma were treated with the systemic administration of 60 mg/kg of carboplatin (four rats) or 150 mg/kg of gemcitabine (four rats) 7 days postimplantation. Clinical, gross, and histological analyses were used to determine toxicity and efficacy. Toxicity occurred in rats that had received only the highest dose of the CED of carboplatin or gemcitabine. Among rats with 9L gliomas, all control and systemically treated animals died within 26 days of tumor implantation. Long-term survival (120 days) and eradication of the tumor occurred in both CED-treated groups (75% of rats in the carboplatin group and 50% of rats in the gemcitabine group). Furthermore, animals harboring the 9L glioma and treated with intratumoral CED of carboplatin or gemcitabine survived significantly longer than controls treated with intratumoral saline (p < 0.01) or systemic chemotherapy (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The perfusion of sensitive regions of the rat brain can be accomplished without toxicity by using therapeutic concentrations of carboplatin or gemcitabine. In addition, CED of carboplatin or gemcitabine to tumors in this glioma model is safe and has potent antitumor effects. These findings indicate that similar treatment paradigms may be useful in the treatment of glial neoplasms in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14609170     DOI: 10.3171/jns.2003.99.5.0893

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  42 in total

1.  Convection-enhanced delivery catheter placements for high-grade gliomas: complications and pitfalls.

Authors:  Tal Shahar; Zvi Ram; Andrew A Kanner
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Interstitial infusion of glioma-targeted recombinant immunotoxin 8H9scFv-PE38.

Authors:  Neal Luther; Nai-Kong Cheung; Eleni P Souliopoulos; Ioannis Karampelas; Ioannis Karempelas; Daniel Bassiri; Mark A Edgar; Hong-Fen Guo; Ira Pastan; Philip H Gutin; Mark M Souweidane
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 3.  Promising approaches to circumvent the blood-brain barrier: progress, pitfalls and clinical prospects in brain cancer.

Authors:  Iason T Papademetriou; Tyrone Porter
Journal:  Ther Deliv       Date:  2015-08-25

4.  In vivo evaluation of needle force and friction stress during insertion at varying insertion speed into the brain.

Authors:  Fernando Casanova; Paul R Carney; Malisa Sarntinoranont
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  Metabolic targeting of lactate efflux by malignant glioma inhibits invasiveness and induces necrosis: an in vivo study.

Authors:  Chaim B Colen; Yimin Shen; Farhad Ghoddoussi; Pingyang Yu; Todd B Francis; Brandon J Koch; Michael D Monterey; Matthew P Galloway; Andrew E Sloan; Saroj P Mathupala
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 5.715

6.  Imaging and nanomedicine for diagnosis and therapy in the central nervous system: report of the eleventh annual Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption Consortium meeting.

Authors:  L L Muldoon; P G Tratnyek; P M Jacobs; N D Doolittle; G A Christoforidis; J A Frank; M Lindau; P R Lockman; S P Manninger; Y Qiang; A M Spence; S I Stupp; M Zhang; E A Neuwelt
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Reflux-free cannula for convection-enhanced high-speed delivery of therapeutic agents.

Authors:  Michal T Krauze; Ryuta Saito; Charles Noble; Matyas Tamas; John Bringas; John W Park; Mitchel S Berger; Krystof Bankiewicz
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 8.  Convection-enhanced delivery for the treatment of pediatric neurologic disorders.

Authors:  Debbie K Song; Russell R Lonser
Journal:  J Child Neurol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.987

9.  Efficacy of intracerebral delivery of cisplatin in combination with photon irradiation for treatment of brain tumors.

Authors:  Julia Rousseau; Rolf F Barth; Manuel Fernandez; Jean-François Adam; Jacques Balosso; François Estève; Hélène Elleaume
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 4.130

10.  Interstitial continuous infusion therapy in a malignant glioma model in rats.

Authors:  Yuichi Tange; Akihide Kondo; Merrill J Egorin; Barbara Mania-Farnell; Georgy M Daneriallis; Hiromichi Nakazaki; Simone T Sredni; Veena Rajaram; Stewart Goldman; Marcelo B Soares; Tadanori Tomita
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 1.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.