Literature DB >> 14608609

A practical and user-friendly toxicity classification system with microbiotests for natural waters and wastewaters.

Guido Persoone1, Blahoslav Marsalek, Irina Blinova, Andrea Törökne, Dzidra Zarina, Levonas Manusadzianas, Grzegorz Nalecz-Jawecki, Lucica Tofan, Nadejda Stepanova, Livia Tothova, Boris Kolar.   

Abstract

Various types of toxicity classification systems have been elaborated by scientists in different countries, with the aim of attributing a hazard score to polluted environments or toxic wastewaters or of ranking them in accordance with increasing levels of toxicity. All these systems are based on batteries of standard acute toxicity tests (several of them including chronic assays as well) and are therefore dependent on the culturing and maintenance of live stocks of test organisms. Most systems require performance of the bioassays on dilution series of the original samples, for subsequent calculation of L(E)C50 or threshold toxicity values. Given the complexity and costs of these toxicity measurements, they can only be applied in well-equipped and highly specialized laboratories, and none of the classification methods so far has found general acceptance at the international level. The development of microbiotests that are independent of continuous culturing of live organisms has stimulated international collaboration. Coordinated at Ghent University, Belgium, collaboration by research groups from 10 countries in central and eastern Europe resulted in an alternative toxicity classification system that was easier to apply and substantially more cost effective than any of the earlier methods. This new system was developed and applied in the framework of a cooperation agreement between the Flemish community in Belgium and central and eastern Europe. The toxicity classification system is based on a battery of (culture-independent) microbiotests and is particularly suited for routine monitoring. It indeed only requires testing on undiluted samples of natural waters or wastewaters discharged into the aquatic environment, except for wastewaters that demonstrate more than 50% effect. The scoring system ranks the waters or wastewaters in 5 classes of increasing hazard/toxicity, with calculation of a weight factor for the concerned hazard/toxicity class. The new classification system was applied during 2000 by the participating laboratories on samples of river water, groundwaters, drinking waters, mine waters, sediment pore waters, industrial effluents, soil leachates, and waste dump leachates and was found to be easy to apply and reliable. Copyright 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14608609     DOI: 10.1002/tox.10141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol        ISSN: 1520-4081            Impact factor:   4.119


  35 in total

1.  Chlorination in a wastewater treatment plant: acute toxicity effects of the effluent and of the recipient water body.

Authors:  Cristina Pignata; Elisabetta Fea; Renato Rovere; Raffaella Degan; Eugenio Lorenzi; Margherita de Ceglia; Tiziana Schilirò; Giorgio Gilli
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Assessment of ecological risks linked to the discharge of saline industrial effluent into a river.

Authors:  Yves Perrodin; Laurence Volatier; Christine Bazin; Jean-Claude Boisson
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-06-10       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Potential of the microbial assay for risk assessment (MARA) for assessing ecotoxicological effects of herbicides to non-target organisms.

Authors:  Patricia Bi Asanga Fai; Mpoame Mbida; Jean Marc Demefack; Cedric Yamssi
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Towards a multi-bioassay-based index for toxicity assessment of fluvial waters.

Authors:  Lalit K Pandey; Isabelle Lavoie; Soizic Morin; Stephen Depuydt; Jie Lyu; Hojun Lee; Jinho Jung; Dong-Hyuk Yeom; Taejun Han; Jihae Park
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Environmental hazard assessment by the Ecoscore system to discriminate PAH-polluted soils.

Authors:  Christine Lors; Jean-François Ponge; Denis Damidot
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Treatment of a wastewater from a pesticide manufacture by combined coagulation and Fenton oxidation.

Authors:  G Pliego; J A Zazo; M I Pariente; I Rodríguez; A L Petre; P Leton; J García
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Acute toxicity and chemical evaluation of coking wastewater under biological and advanced physicochemical treatment processes.

Authors:  Ma Dehua; Liu Cong; Zhu Xiaobiao; Liu Rui; Chen Lujun
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Evaluation of ecotoxicological and chemical properties of soil amended with Hudson River (New York, USA) sediment.

Authors:  Magdalena Urbaniak; Agnieszka Baran; Magdalena Szara; Elżbieta Mierzejewska; Sunmi Lee; Mari Takazawa; Kurunthachalam Kannan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-12-28       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Is the evaluation of "traditional" physicochemical parameters sufficient to explain the potential toxicity of the treated wastewater at sewage treatment plants?

Authors:  M I Vasquez; D Fatta-Kassinos
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Ecotoxicological characteristics and ecological risk assessment of trace elements in the bottom sediments of the Rożnów reservoir (Poland).

Authors:  Magdalena Szara; Agnieszka Baran; Agnieszka Klimkowicz-Pawlas; Marek Tarnawski
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 2.823

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.