Literature DB >> 14606364

Combining artificial neural networks and transrectal ultrasound in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Christopher R Porter1, E David Crawford.   

Abstract

Arguably the most important step in the prognosis of prostate cancer is early diagnosis. More than 1 million transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate needle biopsies are performed annually in the United States, resulting in the detection of 200,000 new cases per year. Unfortunately, the urologist's ability to diagnose prostate cancer has not kept pace with therapeutic advances; currently, many men are facing the need for prostate biopsy with the likelihood that the result will be inconclusive. This paper will focus on the tools available to assist the clinician in predicting the outcome of the prostate needle biopsy. We will examine the use of "machine learning" models (artificial intelligence), in the form of artificial neural networks (ANNs), to predict prostate biopsy outcomes using prebiopsy variables. Currently, six validated predictive models are available. Of these, five are machine learning models, and one is based on logistic regression. The role of ANNs in providing valuable predictive models to be used in conjunction with TRUS appears promising. In the few studies that have compared machine learning to traditional statistical methods, ANN and logistic regression appear to function equivalently when predicting biopsy outcome. With the introduction of more complex prebiopsy variables, ANNs are in a commanding position for use in predictive models. Easy and immediate physician access to these models will be imperative if their full potential is to be realized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14606364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)        ISSN: 0890-9091            Impact factor:   2.990


  6 in total

Review 1.  Artificial neural networks and prostate cancer--tools for diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Xinhai Hu; Henning Cammann; Hellmuth-A Meyer; Kurt Miller; Klaus Jung; Carsten Stephan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  ATHENA: A knowledge-based hybrid backpropagation-grammatical evolution neural network algorithm for discovering epistasis among quantitative trait Loci.

Authors:  Stephen D Turner; Scott M Dudek; Marylyn D Ritchie
Journal:  BioData Min       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 2.522

3.  Anatomic segmentation improves prostate cancer detection with artificial neural networks analysis of 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging.

Authors:  Lukasz Matulewicz; Jacobus F A Jansen; Louisa Bokacheva; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Oguz Akin; Samson W Fine; Amita Shukla-Dave; James A Eastham; Hedvig Hricak; Jason A Koutcher; Kristen L Zakian
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Alteration of proliferation and apoptotic markers in normal and premalignant tissue associated with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Vijayalakshmi Ananthanarayanan; Ryan J Deaton; Ximing J Yang; Michael R Pins; Peter H Gann
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Comparison of three data mining models for prediction of advanced schistosomiasis prognosis in the Hubei province.

Authors:  Guo Li; Xiaorong Zhou; Jianbing Liu; Yuanqi Chen; Hengtao Zhang; Yanyan Chen; Jianhua Liu; Hongbo Jiang; Junjing Yang; Shaofa Nie
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2018-02-15

6.  Multi-modality self-attention aware deep network for 3D biomedical segmentation.

Authors:  Xibin Jia; Yunfeng Liu; Zhenghan Yang; Dawei Yang
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 2.796

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.