Literature DB >> 14604553

Service-level selection by HMOs in Medicare.

Zhun Cao1, Thomas G McGuire.   

Abstract

In the federal Medicare program, contracting health maintenance organizations (HMOs) are paid on a capitated basis. There has long been concern that an "adverse selection" of risks remain in the traditional fee-for-service (FFS) sector, since beneficiaries with low costs may leave the FFS sector and join the HMOs. The distortion associated with this form of selection is that health plans may design their mix of health care services in order to effectuate favorable selection. This paper scrutinizes patterns of HMO membership and costs by service in the FFS sector for evidence consistent with the hypothesis that HMOs engage in service-level product distortion. We develop a multi-service model of choice between FFS and HMOs and show that if the HMO sector is underproviding (overproviding) a service relative to the FFS sector, we should observe a positive (negative) correlation between the HMO market share and average costs of those remaining in the FFS sector. We estimate the correlation between the HMO market share and the average FFS costs for different health care services using Medicare data for 1996. We find evidence indicating that there exists significant service-level selection by HMOs.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14604553     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2003.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Econ        ISSN: 0167-6296            Impact factor:   3.883


  14 in total

1.  HMO versus non-HMO private managed care plans: an investigation on pre-switch consumption.

Authors:  Lu Ji; Fei Liu
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2007-02

2.  Using global ratings of health plans to improve the quality of health care.

Authors:  Jacob Glazer; Thomas G McGuire; Zhun Cao; Alan Zaslavsky
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Assessing incentives for service-level selection in private health insurance exchanges.

Authors:  Thomas G McGuire; Joseph P Newhouse; Sharon-Lise Normand; Julie Shi; Samuel Zuvekas
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  HOW MUCH FAVORABLE SELECTION IS LEFT IN MEDICARE ADVANTAGE?

Authors:  Joseph P Newhouse; Mary Price; J Michael McWilliams; John Hsu; Thomas G McGuire
Journal:  Am J Health Econ       Date:  2015

5.  Managed care quality of care and plan choice in New York SCHIP.

Authors:  Hangsheng Liu; Charles E Phelps; Peter J Veazie; Andrew W Dick; Jonathan D Klein; Laura P Shone; Katia Noyes; Peter G Szilagyi
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Risk-Adjustment Simulation: Plans May Have Incentives To Distort Mental Health And Substance Use Coverage.

Authors:  Ellen Montz; Tim Layton; Alisa B Busch; Randall P Ellis; Sherri Rose; Thomas G McGuire
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  Measuring efficiency of health plan payment systems in managed competition health insurance markets.

Authors:  Timothy J Layton; Randall P Ellis; Thomas G McGuire; Richard van Kleef
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.883

8.  Do Medicare Advantage plans select enrollees in higher margin clinical categories?

Authors:  Joseph P Newhouse; J Michael McWilliams; Mary Price; Jie Huang; Bruce Fireman; John Hsu
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.883

9.  Risk selection, risk adjustment and choice: concepts and lessons from the Americas.

Authors:  Randall P Ellis; Juan Gabriel Fernandez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Improving risk equalization with constrained regression.

Authors:  Richard C van Kleef; Thomas G McGuire; René C J A van Vliet; Wynand P P M van de Ven
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2016-12-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.