T I Omari1, G P Davidson. 1. Centre for Paediatric and Adolescent Gastroenterology, Women's and Children's Hospital and Department of Paediatrics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia. taher.omari@adelaide.edu.au
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The diagnostic use of 24 hour oesophageal pH monitoring in infants is controversial because of the impact of feed buffering of gastric acidity. AIM: To re-evaluate the effect of feeding on gastric pH and reflux using multipoint pH measurements. SUBJECTS: Fifteen healthy premature infants fed every four hours. METHODS: Oesophageal pH and intragastric pH at 3, 6, and 9 cm below the lower oesophageal sphincter were simultaneously measured using a four channel pH probe for four hours after bolus feeding. Parameters of pH were compared for the different levels within the stomach. During reflux episodes, the nadir pH was compared with intragastric pH at all levels. RESULTS: The proximal stomach was more significantly buffered by feeding and slower to re-acidify postprandially than the mid and distal stomach (42.2% of the time at pH < 4 compared with 58.7% and 55.7% respectively). During 27 of 62 gastro-oesophageal reflux episodes, nadir oesophageal pH was lower than the pH of the proximal stomach but always equal to or higher than the pH of the distal stomach. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that previous studies may have overestimated the effect of feeding on gastric acidity and reflux.
BACKGROUND: The diagnostic use of 24 hour oesophageal pH monitoring in infants is controversial because of the impact of feed buffering of gastric acidity. AIM: To re-evaluate the effect of feeding on gastric pH and reflux using multipoint pH measurements. SUBJECTS: Fifteen healthy premature infants fed every four hours. METHODS: Oesophageal pH and intragastric pH at 3, 6, and 9 cm below the lower oesophageal sphincter were simultaneously measured using a four channel pH probe for four hours after bolus feeding. Parameters of pH were compared for the different levels within the stomach. During reflux episodes, the nadir pH was compared with intragastric pH at all levels. RESULTS: The proximal stomach was more significantly buffered by feeding and slower to re-acidify postprandially than the mid and distal stomach (42.2% of the time at pH < 4 compared with 58.7% and 55.7% respectively). During 27 of 62 gastro-oesophageal reflux episodes, nadir oesophageal pH was lower than the pH of the proximal stomach but always equal to or higher than the pH of the distal stomach. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that previous studies may have overestimated the effect of feeding on gastric acidity and reflux.
Authors: N Washington; P J Spensley; C A Smith; M Parker; D Bush; S J Jackson; L Kapila; T Stephenson; C Washington Journal: Arch Dis Child Date: 1999-10 Impact factor: 3.791
Authors: Yong Hu; Lena Hell; Ruth Anna Kendlbacher; Najat Hajji; Chi Hau; Annemieke van Dam; René J Berckmans; Lukas Wisgrill; Cihan Ay; Ingrid Pabinger; Alain Brisson; Andreas Repa; Rienk Nieuwland; Johannes Thaler Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2020-12-22
Authors: Frankie B Fike; Vincent E Mortellaro; Janine N Pettiford; Daniel J Ostlie; Shawn D St Peter Journal: Pediatr Surg Int Date: 2011-04-06 Impact factor: 1.827
Authors: Erik A Jensen; Huayan Zhang; Rui Feng; Kevin Dysart; Kathleen Nilan; David A Munson; Haresh Kirpalani Journal: Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed Date: 2019-11-04 Impact factor: 5.747