Literature DB >> 14601336

Patients' views of a pharmacist-run medication review clinic in general practice.

Duncan R Petty1, Peter Knapp, D K Raynor, Allan O House.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reviewing elderly patients' medication is a requirement of the National Service Framework for Older People. Many general practitioners have insufficient time to review patients' medications in a consultation. Pharmacist review has been offered as an alternative and this will be a new experience for many patients. AIM: To ascertain patients' views of a pharmacist-conducted medication review clinic, run in their general practice surgery. DESIGN OF STUDY: Qualitative study using focus group interviews.
SETTING: General practices in Leeds Health Authority area.
METHOD: Patients aged 65 years and over, who had attended a medicine review clinic, took part in focus groups that were recorded and transcribed. Units of information representing an idea were identified and similar ideas were grouped together as themes.
RESULTS: Patients had a number of prior beliefs about the clinic. Most patients knew that the clinic's purpose was to review repeat medication, to find out more about their medicines, and to ask questions about efficacy and side effects. Some patients were suspicious about the purpose of the clinic but others welcomed the opportunity to have an in-depth review and an explanation of their condition and its treatment; some patients did not accept advice or were disappointed that their expectations were not fulfilled. Most patients were happy to attend a yearly review but some expressed guilt about attending the surgery too frequently.
CONCLUSION: Patients who attended the medication review clinics expressed a range of views about the service. Further research into patients' and carers' opinions about medicine review is needed to inform the development of these services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14601336      PMCID: PMC1314674     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  6 in total

1.  Repeat prescribing management--a cause for concern?

Authors:  H McGavock; K Wilson-Davis; J P Connolly
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Who controls repeats?

Authors:  A G Zermansky
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Randomised controlled trial of clinical medication review by a pharmacist of elderly patients receiving repeat prescriptions in general practice.

Authors:  A G Zermansky; D R Petty; D K Raynor; N Freemantle; A Vail; C J Lowe
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-12-08

4.  'Strong medicine': an analysis of pharmacist consultations in primary care.

Authors:  J Chen; N Britten
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.267

5.  "No thank you": why elderly patients declined to participate in a research study.

Authors:  D R Petty; A G Zermansky; D K Raynor; A Vail; C J Lowe; N Freemantle; A D Buttress
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2001-02

6.  Pharmacist-led medication review in patients over 65: a randomized, controlled trial in primary care.

Authors:  J Krska; J A Cromarty; F Arris; D Jamieson; D Hansford; P R Duffus; G Downie; D G Seymour
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 10.668

  6 in total
  18 in total

1.  General practitioners and community pharmacists: times they are a-changing.

Authors:  Sue Ambler
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Reaching vulnerable groups.

Authors:  Carolyn Chew-Graham
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Barriers and enablers to collaborative working between GPs and pharmacists: a qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Polly Duncan; Matthew J Ridd; Deborah McCahon; Bruce Guthrie; Christie Cabral
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 4.  Patient participation in medication reviews is desirable but not evidence-based: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Floor Willeboordse; Jacqueline G Hugtenburg; François G Schellevis; Petra J M Elders
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Post-discharge medication reviews for patients with heart failure: a pilot study.

Authors:  Anne Ponniah; Sepehr Shakib; Christopher J Doecke; Merelyn Boyce; Manya Angley
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2008-06-13

6.  Patient views about polypharmacy medication review clinics run by clinical pharmacists in GP practices.

Authors:  Rosie Snell; Tim Langran; Parastou Donyai
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2017-10-11

7.  Patient reactions to community pharmacies' roles: evidence from the Portuguese market.

Authors:  Francisco G Nunes; Janet E Anderson; Luis M Martins
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  How do physicians conduct medication reviews?

Authors:  Derjung M Tarn; Debora A Paterniti; Richard L Kravitz; Stephanie Fein; Neil S Wenger
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Integrating a pharmacist into the general practice environment: opinions of pharmacist's, general practitioner's, health care consumer's, and practice manager's.

Authors:  Christopher Freeman; W Neil Cottrell; Greg Kyle; Ian Williams; Lisa Nissen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Stakeholder experiences with general practice pharmacist services: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Edwin C K Tan; Kay Stewart; Rohan A Elliott; Johnson George
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.