BACKGROUND: Angiopoietin-1 (Ang1) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) play important roles in vascular formation and maturation, suggesting that the combination of these two would be a promising therapy for ischemia. However, it remains unclear what the best schedule of administration of these cytokines might be. METHODS: Six experimental groups were used to prepare the rabbit ischemic hindlimb model following naked plasmid intramuscular administration as follows: empty vector (C), single gene (Ang1, A; VEGF, V), Ang-1 followed by VEGF (A - V), co-administration of Ang1 and VEGF (A + V), and VEGF followed by Ang1 (V - A). RESULTS: Thirty days after gene administration, A - V showed a significantly increased blood pressure and blood-flow recovery in the ischemic limb compared with the control group. Histological findings by alpha-smooth muscle-actin (alpha-SMA) staining revealed that the two combination groups had more mature vessels as compared with the control group. Significantly, A - V revealed the highest density of alpha-SMA-positive vessels compared with VEGF alone or Ang1 alone. Angiographic assessment revealed that A - V had a greater increased arterial diameter compared with VEGF alone. Edema, one of the major adverse effects induced by VEGF, was not found in A - V throughout the experiments, while VEGF alone and V - A showed severe edema induced by VEGF. CONCLUSIONS: The pre-administration of Ang1 followed by VEGF resulted in an improvement of hemodynamic status, an increased number of vessels covered with alpha-actin-positive mural cells, and prevention of VEGF-mediated edema. Thus, priming by Ang1 gene administration would be beneficial for therapeutic angiogenesis in VEGF gene therapy. Copyright 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
BACKGROUND:Angiopoietin-1 (Ang1) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) play important roles in vascular formation and maturation, suggesting that the combination of these two would be a promising therapy for ischemia. However, it remains unclear what the best schedule of administration of these cytokines might be. METHODS: Six experimental groups were used to prepare the rabbit ischemic hindlimb model following naked plasmid intramuscular administration as follows: empty vector (C), single gene (Ang1, A; VEGF, V), Ang-1 followed by VEGF (A - V), co-administration of Ang1 and VEGF (A + V), and VEGF followed by Ang1 (V - A). RESULTS: Thirty days after gene administration, A - V showed a significantly increased blood pressure and blood-flow recovery in the ischemic limb compared with the control group. Histological findings by alpha-smooth muscle-actin (alpha-SMA) staining revealed that the two combination groups had more mature vessels as compared with the control group. Significantly, A - V revealed the highest density of alpha-SMA-positive vessels compared with VEGF alone or Ang1 alone. Angiographic assessment revealed that A - V had a greater increased arterial diameter compared with VEGF alone. Edema, one of the major adverse effects induced by VEGF, was not found in A - V throughout the experiments, while VEGF alone and V - A showed severe edema induced by VEGF. CONCLUSIONS: The pre-administration of Ang1 followed by VEGF resulted in an improvement of hemodynamic status, an increased number of vessels covered with alpha-actin-positive mural cells, and prevention of VEGF-mediated edema. Thus, priming by Ang1 gene administration would be beneficial for therapeutic angiogenesis in VEGF gene therapy. Copyright 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Authors: C Kristian Enestvedt; Luke Hosack; Shelley R Winn; Brian S Diggs; Barry Uchida; Robert W O'Rourke; Blair A Jobe Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2008-08-15 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: James A Timmons; Eva Jansson; Helene Fischer; Thomas Gustafsson; Paul L Greenhaff; John Ridden; Jonathan Rachman; Carl Johan Sundberg Journal: BMC Biol Date: 2005-09-02 Impact factor: 7.431
Authors: Kelly M Gutpell; Nikola Tasevski; Boaz Wong; William Thomas Hrinivich; Feng Su; Jennifer Hadway; Lise Desjardins; Ting-Yim Lee; Lisa Marie Hoffman Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-03-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Michael Lekas; Poli Lekas; Shirley H J Mei; Yupu Deng; Daniel J Dumont; Duncan J Stewart Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-09-25 Impact factor: 3.240