| Literature DB >> 27134393 |
Ki Soeng Jang1, Sunghwun Kang2, Sang Heon Woo1, Ju Yong Bae1, Ki Ok Shin1.
Abstract
[Purpose] This study investigated the effects of combined open kinetic chain and closed kinetic chain training using pulley exercise machines on muscle strength, anaerobic power, and blood levels of angiogenesis factors.Entities:
Keywords: Angiogenesis factors; Closed kinetic chain; Open kinetic chain
Year: 2016 PMID: 27134393 PMCID: PMC4842474 DOI: 10.1589/jpts.28.960
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Phys Ther Sci ISSN: 0915-5287
Combined open kinetic chain and closed kinetic chain training programs using pulley exercise machines
| Item | Contents | Time (min) |
|---|---|---|
| Warm up | Stretching | 10 min |
| OKC (60% 1RM, 10 rep, 2 sets) and CKC (10 rep, 2 sets) pulley training | Chest press | 40 min |
| Shoulder press | ||
| Pulley curl | ||
| Push down | ||
| Lat pull down | ||
| Knee extension | ||
| Reg curl | ||
| Cool down | Stretching | 10 min |
Physical characteristics of the subjects
| Variable | CO | PT | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | Post | Pre | Post | ||
| Height (cm) | 173.2 ± 2.5 | 173.5 ± 2.5 | 173.7 ± 1.78 | 174.1 ± 1.6 | |
| Weight (kg) | 66.5 ± 2.7 | 67.5 ± 2.8 | 68.8 ± 2.7 | 69.5 ± 2.6 | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.3 ± 1.2 | 22.6 ± 1.2 | 22.8 ± 0.8 | 22.9 ± 0.9 | |
| Body fat (%) | 17.4 ± 2.0 | 17.9 ± 2.2 | 19.5 ± 1.6 | 17.9 ± 1.6* | |
| LBM (kg) | 54.7 ± 1.3 | 55.0 ± 1.2 | 55.0 ± 1.2 | 56.8 ± 1.1* | |
Values are mean±SE. BMI: body mass index; LBM: lean body mass; CO: control group; PT: pulley training group. *p<0.05 vs. Pre
Lipid profiles
| Variable | CO | PT | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | Post | Pre | Post | |
| TC (mg/dL) | 154.4 ± 8.2 | 153.9 ± 8.5 | 158.8 ± 13.9 | 149.5 ± 8.3 |
| TG (mg/dL) | 75.6 ± 5.4 | 70.8 ± 4.9 | 72.2 ± 3.8 | 55.2 ± 2.4*# |
| FFA (μEq/L) | 466.8 ± 59.7 | 512.9 ± 74.1 | 471.1 ± 69.0 | 499.6 ± 38.1 |
| HDL-c (mg/dL) | 51.6 ± 2.5 | 51.7 ± 1.9 | 50.6 ± 1.4 | 47.5 ± 1.6 |
| LDL-c (mg/dL) | 87.7 ± 8.6 | 88.0 ± 9.9 | 93.7 ± 13.8 | 88.9 ± 9.3 |
Values are mean±SE.
CO: control group; PT: pulley training group
*p<0.05 vs. Pre, #p<0.05 vs. CO
The results for trunk (60°/s) muscle strength after 8 weeks of training
| Variable | CO | PT | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | Post | Pre | Post | |
| FPT (N∙m) | 224.2 ± 30.1 | 218.2 ± 25.9 | 227.8 ± 17.7 | 298.7 ± 19.7*# |
| FPT%BW (N∙m) | 291.8 ± 20.5 | 277.1 ± 10.1 | 274.8 ± 19.9 | 362.4 ± 16.3*# |
| FWR (N∙m) | 139.7 ± 10.9 | 143.9 ± 12.9 | 143.2 ± 13.4 | 186.2 ± 7.8*# |
| FWR%BW (N∙m) | 215.6 ± 18.0 | 196.3 ± 12.4 | 195.9 ± 13.4 | 261.3 ± 15.3*# |
| EPT (N∙m) | 250.9 ± 8.1 | 247.8 ± 8.8 | 232.3 ± 9.6 | 287.3 ± 11.0*# |
| EPT%BW (N∙m) | 329.9 ± 19.2 | 323.6 ± 20.5 | 362.8 ± 19.2 | 406.5 ± 19.2*# |
| EWR (N∙m) | 249.9 ± 12.8 | 255.3 ± 11.5 | 256.5 ± 11.3 | 292.2 ± 13.5*# |
| EWR%BW (N∙m) | 340.4 ± 24.7 | 317.8 ± 23.4 | 364.4 ± 24.4 | 422.1 ± 19.0*# |
Values are mean±SE. FPT: flexor peak torque; FPT%BW: FPT per body weight; FWR: flexor work per repetition; FWR%BW: FWR per body weight; EPT: extensor peak torque; EPT%BW: EPT per body weight; EWR: extensor work per repetition; EWR%BW: EWR per body weight; CO: control group; PT: pulley training group
The results for knee (60°/s) muscular strength after 8 weeks of training
| Variable | CO | PT | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | Post | Pre | Post | |
| FPT (N∙m) | 88.8 ± 8.3 | 82.2 ± 10.2 | 83.2 ± 6.8 | 105.3 ± 5.8*# |
| FPT%BW (N∙m) | 129.0 ± 11.1 | 120.7 ± 13.9 | 123.2 ± 9.6 | 154.3 ± 9.2*# |
| FWR (N∙m) | 109.4 ± 8.0 | 107.8 ± 9.7 | 109.6 ± 8.5 | 130.2 ± 9.2*# |
| FWR%BW (N∙m) | 161.2 ± 12.8 | 154.9 ± 12.4 | 162.6 ± 11.2 | 198.1 ± 11.6*# |
| EPT (N∙m) | 161.4 ± 13.8 | 166.6 ± 7.4 | 168.5 ± 10.2 | 197.9 ± 8.1*# |
| EPT%BW (N∙m) | 242.1 ± 15.1 | 244.4 ± 14.2 | 245.2 ± 9.3 | 277.5 ± 9.2*# |
| EWR (N∙m) | 182.9 ± 7.9 | 183.2 ± 9.5 | 184.5 ± 8.5 | 224.4 ± 11.4*# |
| EWR%BD (N∙m) | 264.7 ± 14.9 | 266.7 ± 16.7 | 268.1 ± 11.5 | 303.7 ± 12.4*# |
Values are mean±SE.
FPT: flexor peak torque; FPT%BW: FPT per body weight; FWR: flexor work per repetition; FWR%BW: FWR per body weight; EPT: extensor peak torque; EPT%BW: EPT per body weight; EWR: extensor work per repetition; EWR%BW: EWR per body weight; CO: control group; PT: pulley training group.
*p<0.05 vs. Pre, #p<0.05 vs. CO
The anaerobic power of each group
| Variable | CO | PT | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | Post | Pre | Post | |
| AP (w) | 535.1 ± 16.2 | 540.9 ± 19.9 | 557.8 ± 17.2 | 597.6 ± 12.8* |
| PP (w) | 672.8 ± 32.2 | 696.2 ± 34.7 | 675.7 ± 21.3 | 741.3 ± 21.8* |
| PPS (rpm) | 138.8 ± 6.9 | 142.4 ± 5.1 | 134.3 ± 3.8 | 146.3 ± 4.9* |
| PAT (s) | 6.6 ± 0.6 | 6.5 ± 0.7 | 10.8 ± 1.5 | 8.09 ± 1.3 |
Values are mean±SE. AP: average power; PP: peak power; PPS: peak pedaling speed; PAT: peak attainment time; CO: control group; PT: pulley training group. *p<0.05 vs. Pre
The changes in angiogenesis factors and follistatin after 8 weeks of training
| Variable | CO | PT | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | Post | Pre | Post | |
| VEGF (pg/mL) | 47.0 ± 1.3 | 47.7 ± 0.9 | 50.3 ± 3.0 | 52.8 ± 4.0* |
| Ang 1 (pg/mL) | 403.9 ± 29.2 | 504.7 ± 24.0* | 348.4 ± 18.5 | 540.6 ± 39.1* |
| Ang 2 (pg/mL) | 17.9 ± 0.5 | 17.1 ± 0.4 | 16.5 ± 0.7 | 16.3 ± 0.7 |
| Follistatin (pg/mL) | 22.2 ± 3.8 | 24.9 ± 2.8 | 23.7 ± 3.4 | 29.1 ± 3.9* |
Values are mean±SE. VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor; Ang 1: angiopoietin 1; Ang 2: angiopoietin 2; CO: control group; PT: pulley training group. *p<0.05 vs. Pre