Literature DB >> 14601014

ROC methodology within a monitoring framework.

Corette B Parker1, Elizabeth R DeLong.   

Abstract

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methodology is widely used to evaluate and compare diagnostic tests. Generally, each diagnostic test is applied once to each subject in a population and the results, reported on a continuous scale, are used to construct the ROC curve. We extend the standard method to accommodate a framework in which the diagnostic test is repeated over time to monitor for occurrence of an event. Unlike the usual situation in which event status is static, the problem we address involves event status that is not constant over the monitoring period. Subjects generally are classified as non-events, or controls, until they experience events that convert them to cases. Viewing the data as incomplete discrete failure time data with time-varying covariates, potentially useful diagnostic markers can be related appropriately in time with the true condition and varying amounts of information per individual can be taken into account. The ROC curve provides an assessment of the performance of the test in combination with the schedule of testing. Within this framework, a computational simplification is introduced to calculate variances and covariances for the areas under the ROC curves. Periodic monitoring for reperfusion following thrombolytic treatment for acute myocardial infarction provides a detailed example, whereby the lengths of the testing interval combined with different diagnostic markers are compared. Copyright 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14601014     DOI: 10.1002/sim.1580

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  7 in total

1.  Evaluating the ROC performance of markers for future events.

Authors:  Margaret S Pepe; Yingye Zheng; Yuying Jin; Ying Huang; Chirag R Parikh; Wayne C Levy
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Dynamic Optimal Strategy for Monitoring Disease Recurrence.

Authors:  Hong Li; Constantine Gatsonis
Journal:  Sci China Math       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 1.331

3.  Articular Cartilage of the Human Knee Joint: In Vivo Multicomponent T2 Analysis at 3.0 T.

Authors:  Fang Liu; Kwang Won Choi; Alexey Samsonov; Richard G Spencer; John J Wilson; Walter F Block; Richard Kijowski
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Evaluation of quantitative IFN-gamma response for risk stratification of active tuberculosis suspects.

Authors:  John Z Metcalfe; Adithya Cattamanchi; Eric Vittinghoff; Christine Ho; Jennifer Grinsdale; Philip C Hopewell; L Masae Kawamura; Payam Nahid
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 21.405

5.  Thermography imaging during static and controlled thermoregulation in complex regional pain syndrome type 1: diagnostic value and involvement of the central sympathetic system.

Authors:  Sjoerd P Niehof; Frank J P M Huygen; Rick W P van der Weerd; Mirjam Westra; Freek J Zijlstra
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 2.819

6.  Increased prediction value of biomarker combinations for the conversion of mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's dementia.

Authors:  Aonan Zhao; Yuanyuan Li; Yi Yan; Yinghui Qiu; Binyin Li; Wei Xu; Ying Wang; Jun Liu; Yulei Deng
Journal:  Transl Neurodegener       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 8.014

7.  Development of a model based on biochemical, real‑time tissue elastography and ultrasound data for the staging of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B.

Authors:  Shi-Hao Xu; Qiao Li; Yuan-Ping Hu; Li Ying
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 2.952

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.