Literature DB >> 14600187

Fenoldopam mesylate for the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: a randomized controlled trial.

Gregg W Stone1, Peter A McCullough, James A Tumlin, Norman E Lepor, Hooman Madyoon, Patrick Murray, Andrew Wang, A Alan Chu, Gary L Schaer, Melissa Stevens, Robert L Wilensky, William W O'Neill.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The development of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing invasive cardiac procedures is associated with a marked increase in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Fenoldopam mesylate, a specific agonist of the dopamine-1 receptor, preserves renal blood flow after iodinated contrast administration and has shown promise in ameliorating contrast nephropathy in previous observational and small randomized trials.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy of fenoldopam mesylate in preventing contrast nephropathy after invasive cardiovascular procedures.
DESIGN: Prospective, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter randomized trial with serial serum creatinine levels measured at a central biochemistry laboratory (at baseline and 1, 24, 48, and 72 to 96 hours after study drug administration) and 30-day clinical follow-up. PATIENTS AND
SETTING: Between March 2001 and July 2002, 315 patients with creatinine clearance less than 60 mL/min (1.00 mL/s) at 28 centers in the United States were randomized to receive fenoldopam mesylate (n = 157) or placebo (n = 158).
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were hydrated and randomized to receive intravenous fenoldopam (0.05 microg/kg/min titrated to 0.10 microg/kg/min) vs matching placebo, starting 1 hour prior to angiography and continuing for 12 hours. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Contrast-induced nephropathy, defined as an increase of 25% or more in serum creatinine level within 96 hours postprocedure.
RESULTS: Mean (SD) patient age was 70 (11) years, and 49% had diabetes mellitus. Mean (SD) baseline creatinine clearance was 29.0 (10.0) mL/min (0.48 [0.16] mL/s) (range, 7.5-56.8 mL/min [0.12-0.94 mL/s]), and 157 (108) mL of contrast was administered during the procedures. The primary end point of contrast-induced nephropathy occurred in 33.6% of patients assigned to receive fenoldopam vs 30.1% assigned to receive placebo (relative risk, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-1.57; P =.61). There were no significant differences in the 30-day rates of death (2.0% vs 3.8%, P =.50), dialysis (2.6% vs 1.9%, P =.72), or rehospitalization (17.6% vs 19.9%, P =.66) in fenoldopam vs placebo randomized patients, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The selective dopamine-1 agonist fenoldopam mesylate does not prevent further renal function deterioration after contrast administration in patients with chronic renal insufficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14600187     DOI: 10.1001/jama.290.17.2284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  76 in total

1.  Use and efficacy of saline hydration and N-acetyl cysteine to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy in low-risk populations undergoing coronary artery angiography.

Authors:  Paolo Calabrò; Renatomaria Bianchi; Mario Crisci; Mario Caprile; Maurizio Cappelli Bigazzi; Rosalinda Palmieri; Enrica Golia; Anna De Vita; Ilaria Jane Romano; Giuseppe Limongelli; Maria Giovanna Russo; Raffaele Calabrò
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 2.  How to protect from contrast media-induced nephropathy?

Authors:  B Scheller
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 3.  Contrast-induced acute kidney injury and diabetic nephropathy.

Authors:  Andrew D Calvin; Sanjay Misra; Axel Pflueger
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 28.314

4.  Contrast-induced nephropathy: what we know, what we think we know, and what we don't know.

Authors:  Brian Funaki
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 5.  Use of inotropes and vasopressor agents in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Mansoor N Bangash; Ming-Li Kong; Rupert M Pearse
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 6.  [Iodinated contrast agent-induced nephropathy].

Authors:  C Erley
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 7.  Acute renal failure.

Authors:  John A Kellum; Martine Leblanc; Ramesh Venkataraman
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2008-09-03

Review 8.  Contrast-induced nephropathy: pathogenesis and prevention.

Authors:  Robert E Cronin
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 3.714

9.  A prospective assessment of renal impairment after preparation for colonoscopy: oral sodium phosphate appears to be safe in well-hydrated subjects with normal renal status.

Authors:  M A Korsten; A M Spungen; A R Rosman; H R Ancha; J B Post; S Shaw; K K Hunt; R Williams; W A Bauman
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 10.  Preventing contrast-induced nephropathy: problems, challenges and future directions.

Authors:  Richard Solomon
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 8.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.