Literature DB >> 21326680

Contrast-induced nephropathy: what we know, what we think we know, and what we don't know.

Brian Funaki1.   

Abstract

Contrast-induced nephropathy is a common but poorly understood problem. A large body of literature devoted to the subject is replete with contradictions and conflicting reports. The purpose of this article is to summarize our current understanding of the problem by reviewing some of the best studies done to date. Recommendations based on the current literature are also provided.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contrast; contrast-induced nephropathy; nephropathy; radiology; renal insufficiency; review

Year:  2005        PMID: 21326680      PMCID: PMC3036263          DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-871865

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol        ISSN: 0739-9529            Impact factor:   1.513


  37 in total

Review 1.  Contrast media-associated nephrotoxicity.

Authors:  M R Rudnick; J S Berns; R M Cohen; S Goldfarb
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 5.299

2.  Prevention of contrast media-associated nephropathy: randomized comparison of 2 hydration regimens in 1620 patients undergoing coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  Christian Mueller; Gerd Buerkle; Heinz J Buettner; Jens Petersen; André P Perruchoud; Urs Eriksson; Stephan Marsch; Helmut Roskamm
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002-02-11

3.  Comparison of iodixanol and iohexol in renal impairment.

Authors:  N Chalmers; R W Jackson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Prevention of radiographic-contrast-agent-induced reductions in renal function by acetylcysteine.

Authors:  M Tepel; M van der Giet; C Schwarzfeld; U Laufer; D Liermann; W Zidek
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-07-20       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Prophylactic hemodialysis after radiocontrast media in patients with renal insufficiency is potentially harmful.

Authors:  B Vogt; P Ferrari; C Schönholzer; H P Marti; M Mohaupt; M Wiederkehr; C Cereghetti; A Serra; U Huynh-Do; D Uehlinger; F J Frey
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 6.  Are gadolinium-based contrast media really safer than iodinated media for digital subtraction angiography in patients with azotemia?

Authors:  Ulf Nyman; Barbara Elmståhl; Peter Leander; Mats Nilsson; Klaes Golman; Torsten Almén
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Incidence and prognostic importance of acute renal failure after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Charanjit S Rihal; Stephen C Textor; Diane E Grill; Peter B Berger; Henry H Ting; Patricia J Best; Mandeep Singh; Malcolm R Bell; Gregory W Barsness; Verghese Mathew; Kirk N Garratt; David R Holmes
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-05-14       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Lower extremity arteriography with use of iodinated contrast material or gadodiamide to supplement CO2 angiography in patients with renal insufficiency.

Authors:  D J Spinosa; J F Angle; K D Hagspiel; J A Kern; G D Hartwell; A H Matsumoto
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.464

9.  Acetylcysteine and contrast agent-associated nephrotoxicity.

Authors:  Carlo Briguori; Fiore Manganelli; Pierfranco Scarpato; Pietro Paolo Elia; Bruno Golia; Guido Riviezzo; Stefano Lepore; Mariateresa Librera; Bruno Villari; Antonio Colombo; Bruno Ricciardelli
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-07-17       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Renal insufficiency: usefulness of gadodiamide-enhanced renal angiography to supplement CO2-enhanced renal angiography for diagnosis and percutaneous treatment.

Authors:  D J Spinosa; A H Matsumoto; J F Angle; K D Hagspiel; J K McGraw; C Ayers
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  1 in total

1.  Contrast nephropathy: Risk factors and the role of beta blockers.

Authors:  Rodney G Bowden
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.596

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.