Literature DB >> 14599873

Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy using the argon-beam coagulator: pilot data and comparison to laparotomy.

Nadeem R Abu-Rustum1, Mary L Gemignani, Kathleen Moore, Yukio Sonoda, Ennapadam Venkatraman, Carol Brown, Elizabeth Poynor, Dennis S Chi, Richard R Barakat.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe the feasibility and outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for stage I cervical cancer using the argon-beam coagulator.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients with FIGO stage IA1-IB1 cervical cancer who underwent a total laparoscopic approach for definitive surgical treatment. Comparison was made to a cohort of 195 patients who were treated with laparotomy.
RESULTS: Between 12/2000 and 12/2002, 19 patients were offered the laparoscopic approach. The procedure was completed laparoscopically in 17 patients (89.5%). Two patients, in the beginning of the study, underwent conversion to laparotomy, 1 due to parametrial bleeding and 1 due to pelvic adhesions and cystotomy. Mean age was 42.6 years (range, 30-69 years); mean body mass index was 23.1 (range, 18-30); FIGO stage included IA1 with LVI (2), IA2 (6), IB1 (11). Mean pelvic lymph node count was 25.5 (range, 15-39), and 1 patient (5.3%) had positive nodes. Mean estimated blood loss was 301 cc (range, 75-1500 cc) compared to 693 cc in the laparotomy group (P < 0.01), mean operating time was 371 min (range, 230-600 min) compared to 295 min in the laparotomy group (P < 0.01), and mean hospital stay was 4.5 days (range, 3-11 days) compared to 9.7 days in the laparotomy group (P < 0.01). There were no ureteral injuries or fistula formation. All patients remain clinically disease free at the time of this report.
CONCLUSIONS: Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for selected patients with stage I cervical cancer is feasible, safe, and associated with a low morbidity in the pilot phase. Estimated blood loss and postoperative hospitalization appear shorter than historical controls, at the cost of longer operating time. Oncologic outcome requires longer follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14599873     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-8258(03)00518-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  28 in total

1.  Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign and oncologic pathologies: initial clinical experience with 30 patients.

Authors:  F Marchal; P Rauch; J Vandromme; I Laurent; A Lobontiu; B Ahcel; J L Verhaeghe; C Meistelman; M Degueldre; J P Villemot; F Guillemin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  New Developments in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Oncology Surgery.

Authors:  Katherine Ikard Stewart; Amanda N Fader
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.190

3.  Quality of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in developing countries: a comparison of surgical and oncologic outcomes between a comprehensive cancer center in the United States and a cancer center in Colombia.

Authors:  Rene Pareja; Alpa M Nick; Kathleen M Schmeler; Michael Frumovitz; Pamela T Soliman; Carlos A Buitrago; Mauricio Borrero; Gonzalo Angel; Ricardo Dos Reis; Pedro T Ramirez
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy without uterine manipulator for cervical cancer stage IB: description of the technique, our experience and results after the era of LACC trial.

Authors:  Andreas Kavallaris; Nektarios Chalvatzas; Antonios Gkoutzioulis; Dimitrios Zygouris
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 2.344

5.  Comparison of a novel surgical approach for radical hysterectomy: robotic assistance versus open surgery.

Authors:  Gerald Feuer; Benedict Benigno; Lindal Krige; Patricia Alvarez
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2009-10-09

6.  Analgesic and antiemetic requirements after minimally invasive surgery for early cervical cancer: a comparison between laparoscopy and robotic surgery.

Authors:  Pamela T Soliman; Ginger Langley; Mark F Munsell; Hemang A Vaniya; Michael Frumovitz; Pedro T Ramirez
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy has higher risk of perioperative urologic complication than abdominal radical hysterectomy: a meta-analysis of 38 studies.

Authors:  Jong Ha Hwang; Bo Wook Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Early cervical neoplasia: advances in screening and treatment modalities.

Authors:  Brent Tierney; Shannon N Westin; Matthew P Schlumbrecht; Pedro T Ramirez
Journal:  Clin Adv Hematol Oncol       Date:  2010-08

Review 9.  Innovative laparoscopic surgery in gynecologic oncology.

Authors:  Siobhan M Kehoe; Pedro T Ramirez; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.075

10.  A comparison of robot-assisted and traditional radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  M Patrick Lowe; Anna V Hoekstra; Arati Jairam-Thodla; Diljeet K Singh; Barbara M Buttin; John R Lurain; Julian C Schink
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2009-02-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.