Literature DB >> 14599631

Inappropriate initial antimicrobial therapy and its effect on survival in a clinical trial of immunomodulating therapy for severe sepsis.

Stephan Harbarth1, Jorge Garbino, Jérome Pugin, Jacques A Romand, Daniel Lew, Didier Pittet.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the effect of inappropriate initial antimicrobial therapy on the prognosis of patients with sepsis who were enrolled in a clinical trial of an immunomodulating agent conducted in 108 hospitals in North America and Europe.
METHODS: We assessed initial antimicrobial choice and results of microbiologic cultures in 904 patients who had microbiologically confirmed severe sepsis or early septic shock. If a patient did not receive at least one antimicrobial agent to which the causative microorganisms were susceptible within 24 hours from the diagnosis of severe sepsis, then the initial antimicrobial treatment was considered to be inappropriate. A propensity score that adjusted for factors associated with inappropriate antimicrobial treatment was calculated and included in multivariable models to adjust for confounding.
RESULTS: A total of 468 patients (52%) had documented bloodstream infection, and 211 patients (23%) received inappropriate initial antimicrobial therapy. Characteristics associated with inappropriate treatment were study enrollment in Europe, admission to surgery, nosocomial infection, infection with multiresistant microorganisms, and fungal or polymicrobial infection (all P <0.05). The 28-day mortality was 24% (168/693) for patients in the adequately treated group versus 39% (82/211) for patients receiving inappropriate initial antimicrobial therapy (P <0.001). After adjusting for comorbid conditions, severity of illness, site of infection, and the propensity score, inappropriate antimicrobial therapy was independently associated with increased mortality (odds ratio = 1.8; 95% confidence interval: 1.2 to 2.6).
CONCLUSION: In a large cohort of patients with microbiologically confirmed severe sepsis, appropriate initial antimicrobial therapy was an important determinant of survival. New approaches aimed at improving detection and treatment of early sepsis are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14599631     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  156 in total

1.  Impact of inadequate empirical therapy on the mortality of patients with bloodstream infections: a propensity score-based analysis.

Authors:  Pilar Retamar; María M Portillo; María Dolores López-Prieto; Fernando Rodríguez-López; Marina de Cueto; María V García; María J Gómez; Alfonso Del Arco; Angel Muñoz; Antonio Sánchez-Porto; Manuel Torres-Tortosa; Andrés Martín-Aspas; Ascensión Arroyo; Carolina García-Figueras; Federico Acosta; Juan E Corzo; Laura León-Ruiz; Trinidad Escobar-Lara; Jesús Rodríguez-Baño
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of appropriate empiric antibiotic therapy for sepsis.

Authors:  Mical Paul; Vered Shani; Eli Muchtar; Galia Kariv; Eyal Robenshtok; Leonard Leibovici
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Rapid identification of bacteria from positive blood culture bottles by use of matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionization time of flight mass spectrometry fingerprinting.

Authors:  Martin Christner; Holger Rohde; Manuel Wolters; Ingo Sobottka; Karl Wegscheider; Martin Aepfelbacher
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparison of hospital-wide and unit-specific cumulative antibiograms in hospital- and community-acquired infection.

Authors:  F Lamoth; A Wenger; G Prod'hom; Y Vallet; C Plüss-Suard; J Bille; G Zanetti
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 3.553

5.  Why is Acinetobacter baumannii a problem for critically ill patients?

Authors:  Marin H Kollef; Michael S Niederman
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Evaluation of an accelerated protocol for detection of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing gram-negative bacilli from positive blood cultures.

Authors:  Shiri Navon-Venezia; Azita Leavitt; Ronen Ben-Ami; Yuval Aharoni; Mitchell J Schwaber; David Schwartz; Yehuda Carmeli
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  A review of the application of propensity score methods yielded increasing use, advantages in specific settings, but not substantially different estimates compared with conventional multivariable methods.

Authors:  Til Stürmer; Manisha Joshi; Robert J Glynn; Jerry Avorn; Kenneth J Rothman; Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2005-10-13       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  Prior colonization is associated with increased risk of antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacteremia in cancer patients.

Authors:  Aaron S Hess; Michael Kleinberg; John D Sorkin; Giora Netzer; Jennifer K Johnson; Michelle Shardell; Kerri A Thom; Anthony D Harris; Mary-Claire Roghmann
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 2.803

9.  De-escalation of antimicrobial therapy for bacteraemia due to difficult-to-treat Gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  N Shime; T Kosaka; N Fujita
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 3.553

10.  Controlling for severity of illness in outcome studies involving infectious diseases: impact of measurement at different time points.

Authors:  Kerri A Thom; Michelle D Shardell; Regina B Osih; Marin L Schweizer; Jon P Furuno; Eli N Perencevich; Jessina C McGregor; Anthony D Harris
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.