BACKGROUND: Lymphedema may be identified by simpler circumference changes as compared with changes in limb volume. METHODS: Ninety breast cancer patients were prospectively enrolled in an academic trial, and seven upper extremity circumferences were measured quarterly for 3 years. A 10% volume increase or greater than 1 cm increase in arm circumference identified lymphedema with verification by a lymphedema specialist. Sensitivity and specificity of several different criteria for detecting lymphedema were compared using the academic trial as the standard. RESULTS: Thirty-nine cases of lymphedema were identified by the academic trial. Using a 10% increase in circumference at two sites as the criterion, half the lymphedema cases were detected (sensitivity 37%). When using a 10% increase in circumference at any site, 74.4% of cases were detected (sensitivity 49%). Detection by a 5% increase in circumference at any site was 91% sensitive. CONCLUSIONS: An increase of 5% in circumference measurements identified the most potential lymphedema cases compared with an academic trial.
BACKGROUND:Lymphedema may be identified by simpler circumference changes as compared with changes in limb volume. METHODS: Ninety breast cancerpatients were prospectively enrolled in an academic trial, and seven upper extremity circumferences were measured quarterly for 3 years. A 10% volume increase or greater than 1 cm increase in arm circumference identified lymphedema with verification by a lymphedema specialist. Sensitivity and specificity of several different criteria for detecting lymphedema were compared using the academic trial as the standard. RESULTS: Thirty-nine cases of lymphedema were identified by the academic trial. Using a 10% increase in circumference at two sites as the criterion, half the lymphedema cases were detected (sensitivity 37%). When using a 10% increase in circumference at any site, 74.4% of cases were detected (sensitivity 49%). Detection by a 5% increase in circumference at any site was 91% sensitive. CONCLUSIONS: An increase of 5% in circumference measurements identified the most potential lymphedema cases compared with an academic trial.
Authors: Nicole L Stout; Lucinda A Pfalzer; Barbara Springer; Ellen Levy; Charles L McGarvey; Jerome V Danoff; Lynn H Gerber; Peter W Soballe Journal: Phys Ther Date: 2011-09-15
Authors: Igor Langer; Ulrich Guller; Gilles Berclaz; Ossi R Koechli; Gabriel Schaer; Mathias K Fehr; Thomas Hess; Daniel Oertli; Lucio Bronz; Beate Schnarwyler; Edward Wight; Urs Uehlinger; Eduard Infanger; Daniel Burger; Markus Zuber Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Louise A Koelmeyer; Robert J Borotkanics; Jessica Alcorso; Philip Prah; Caleb J Winch; Kristine Nakhel; Catherine M Dean; John Boyages Journal: Cancer Date: 2018-12-06 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Barrie R Cassileth; Kimberly J Van Zee; K Simon Yeung; Marci I Coleton; Sara Cohen; Yi H Chan; Andrew J Vickers; Daniel D Sjoberg; Clifford A Hudis Journal: Cancer Date: 2013-04-10 Impact factor: 6.860