Literature DB >> 14599572

Spatial attention and object-based attention: a comparison within a single task.

David Soto1, Manuel J Blanco.   

Abstract

There is now much experimental evidence supporting the idea that visual attention can be deployed in at least two ways: one space-based and other object-based. However, it is not clear whether space- and object-based attention work in an integrated way within the visual system. In this article, we present two experiments in which we compare both components of attention within a cueing paradigm. Participants had to discriminate the orientation of a line that appeared within one of four moving circles, differing in colour. A cue appearing close to one of the four circles indicated the location or circle where the target stimulus was likely to appear. Spatial and object cueing effects were observed: responses were faster when target appeared either at the precued location or within the precued object. In addition, the object-cueing effect occurred only when the cue was spatially invalid and not when it was spatially valid. These results suggest that object- and space-based attention interact, with selection by location being primary over object-based selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14599572     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.08.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  10 in total

Review 1.  On the assessment of landmark salience for human navigation.

Authors:  David Caduff; Sabine Timpf
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2007-11-13

2.  Attending to What and Where: Background Connectivity Integrates Categorical and Spatial Attention.

Authors:  Alexa Tompary; Naseem Al-Aidroos; Nicholas B Turk-Browne
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 3.  The negative priming paradigm: An update and implications for selective attention.

Authors:  Christian Frings; Katja Kerstin Schneider; Elaine Fox
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

Review 4.  Exploring visual-spatial working memory: a critical review of concepts and models.

Authors:  J McAfoose; B T Baune
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 7.444

5.  Task-specific engagement of object-based and space-based attention with spatiotemporally defined objects.

Authors:  Qingzi Zheng; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Using goal- and grip-related information for understanding the correctness of other's actions: an ERP study.

Authors:  Michiel van Elk; Roel Bousardt; Harold Bekkering; Hein T van Schie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Can Limitations of Visuospatial Attention Be Circumvented? A Review.

Authors:  Basil Wahn; Peter König
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-10-27

8.  Is Attentional Resource Allocation Across Sensory Modalities Task-Dependent?

Authors:  Basil Wahn; Peter König
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2017-03-31

9.  Limited interactions between space- and feature-based attention in visually sparse displays.

Authors:  Guangsheng Liang; Miranda Scolari
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Left-Hemispheric Asymmetry for Object-Based Attention: an ERP Study.

Authors:  Andrea Orlandi; Alice Mado Proverbio
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2019-11-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.