Literature DB >> 14597524

Impact of graft diameter on corneal power and the regularity of postkeratoplasty astigmatism before and after suture removal.

Berthold Seitz1, Achim Langenbucher, Michael Küchle, Gottfried O H Naumann.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of graft diameter on corneal curvature before and after removal of a double-running suture after nonmechanical penetrating keratoplasty (PK).
DESIGN: Prospective, nonrandomized, comparative (self-controlled) single-center clinical trial. PATIENTS: Four hundred eighty-nine eyes with "two sutures in" and 308 eyes with "all sutures out" (mean age, 52+/-19 years) were included. The diagnoses were keratoconus (48%), Fuchs' and stromal dystrophies (31%), aphakic or pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (11%), and scars (10%).
INTERVENTIONS: In all eyes, a central trephination was performed (donor trephination from the epithelial side) using the 193-nm Meditec excimer laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany) along metal masks with eight "orientation teeth/notches." Diameters were 8.0 mm, 7.5 mm, and 7.0 mm with a graft oversize of 0.1 mm. In 29% of eyes, additional cataract, intraocular lens surgery, or both were performed simultaneously. In all eyes, a double-running 10-0 nylon suture was applied. Zeiss keratometry and TMS-1 topography analysis were performed before removal of the first suture (14+/-4 months) and at least 6 weeks after removal of the second suture (20+/-4 months), but before any additional surgery, such as cataract extraction or refractive keratotomies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Topographic central corneal power (CP; keratometric diopters), keratometric astigmatism (KA), surface regularity index (SRI), and surface asymmetry index (SAI). The regularity of keratometry mires was recorded semiquantitatively from 0 = regular to 3 = not measurable (as published earlier).
RESULTS: With both sutures in, median CP in 7.0-mm (42.0 diopters [D]; P = 0.04) and in 7.5-mm grafts (42.3 D; P = 0.007) was significantly lower than in 8.0-mm grafts (43.0 D). Keratometric astigmatism did not differ between groups (3.0 D vs. 3.0 D vs. 2.7 D). The SRI (1.66 vs. 1.43 vs. 1.11) and SAI (1.55 vs. 1.24 vs. 0.85) decreased significantly with increasing diameter. The proportion of regular keratometry mires (13% vs. 17% vs. 29%) increased, and the proportion of not measurable keratometries (45% vs. 18% vs. 9%) decreased with increasing diameter. With all sutures out, CP in 7.0-mm grafts (40.4 D) was significantly smaller than in 7.5-mm (43.6 D; P = 0.04) and 8.0-mm grafts (43.3 D; P = 0.04). Again, KA did not differ between groups (3.0 D vs. 3.2 D vs. 3.0 D). The SRI (1.40 vs. 1.09 vs. 0.84) and SAI (1.24 vs. 0.83 vs. 0.62) decreased significantly with increasing diameter. The proportion of regular keratometry mires (5% vs. 31% vs. 52%) increased, and the proportion of not measurable keratometries (42% vs. 11% vs. 4%) decreased with increasing diameter.
CONCLUSIONS: After PK, a smaller graft diameter results in a flatter curvature and a higher degree of topographic irregularity, but not in higher net astigmatism. After suture removal, graft topography tends to regularize, whereas the principal differences between diameters do persist.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14597524     DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00659-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  24 in total

1.  A Two-Piece Microkeratome-Assisted Mushroom Keratoplasty Improves the Outcomes and Survival of Grafts Performed in Eyes with Diseased Stroma and Healthy Endothelium (An American Ophthalmological Society Thesis).

Authors:  Massimo Busin; Silvana Madi; Vincenzo Scorcia; Paolo Santorum; Yoav Nahum
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2015

2.  Evaluation of the impacts of formulation variables and excipients on the drug release dynamics of a polyamide 6,10-based monolithic matrix using mathematical tools.

Authors:  Oluwatoyin A Adeleke; Yahya E Choonara; Pradeep Kumar; Lisa C du Toit; Lomas K Tomar; Charu Tyagi; Viness Pillay
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 3.  [The penetrating keratoplasty. A 100-year success story].

Authors:  B Seitz; A Langenbucher; G O H Naumann
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 4.  [Application of wavefront analysis in clinical and scientific settings. From irregular astigmatism to aberrations of a higher order--Part II: examples].

Authors:  J Bühren; T Kohnen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  [Prophylaxis and management of complications in penetrating keratoplasty].

Authors:  B Seitz; M El-Husseiny; A Langenbucher; N Szentmáry
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.059

6.  [DALK and penetrating laser keratoplasty for advanced keratoconus].

Authors:  B Seitz; C Cursiefen; M El-Husseiny; A Viestenz; A Langenbucher; N Szentmáry
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.059

7.  Long-term refractive and visual outcome after penetrating keratoplasty only versus the triple procedure in Fuchs' dystrophy.

Authors:  Sujata Das; Achim Langenbucher; Christina Jacobi; Nhung X Nguyen; Friedrich E Kruse; Gottfried O H Naumann; Berthold Seitz
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-01-14       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 8.  [Perspectives of excimer laser-assisted keratoplasty].

Authors:  B Seitz; A Langenbucher; G O H Naumann
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.059

9.  Corneal radius of curvature after anterior lamellar versus penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  Vincent M Borderie; Cristina Georgeon; Marie Borderie; Nacim Bouheraoua; Olivier Touzeau; Laurent Laroche
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  The effect of different suturing techniques on astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  Sang Jin Kim; Won Ryang Wee; Jin Hak Lee; Mee Kum Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.