Literature DB >> 14597269

Can thematic roles leave traces of their places?

Franklin Chang1, Kathryn Bock, Adele E Goldberg.   

Abstract

An important question in the study of language production is the nature of the semantic information that speakers use to create syntactic structures. A common answer to this question assumes that thematic roles help to mediate the mapping from messages to syntax. However, research using structural priming has suggested that the construction of syntactic frames may be insensitive to variations in thematic roles within messages (Cognition 35 (1990) 1; Psychological Review 99 (1992) 150). Because these studies involved structural alternations whose syntax covaries with the order of thematic roles, it is difficult to assess any independent contribution that role information may make to the positioning of phrases. In this study, we primed the order of the roles without changing the syntactic structure of the sentences produced, and found that the order of the roles was influenced by the priming manipulation. This implies that thematic roles or the features that differentiate them are active within the mapping between messages and sentence structures.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14597269     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00123-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  14 in total

1.  What Goes Wrong during Passive Sentence Production in Agrammatic Aphasia: An Eyetracking Study.

Authors:  Soojin Cho; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 2.773

2.  Beyond common features: the role of roles in determining similarity.

Authors:  Matt Jones; Bradley C Love
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  The functions of structural priming.

Authors:  Victor S Ferreira; Kathryn Bock
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2006-11

Review 4.  Structural priming: a critical review.

Authors:  Martin J Pickering; Victor S Ferreira
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Grammatical Encoding and Learning in Agrammatic Aphasia: Evidence from Structural Priming.

Authors:  Soojin Cho-Reyes; Jennifer E Mack; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.059

6.  Lack of selectivity for syntax relative to word meanings throughout the language network.

Authors:  Evelina Fedorenko; Idan Asher Blank; Matthew Siegelman; Zachary Mineroff
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2020-06-20

7.  Event Structure Influences Language Production: Evidence from Structural Priming in Motion Event Description.

Authors:  Ann Bunger; Anna Papafragou; John C Trueswell
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.059

8.  Experience and sentence processing: statistical learning and relative clause comprehension.

Authors:  Justine B Wells; Morten H Christiansen; David S Race; Daniel J Acheson; Maryellen C MacDonald
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Do you what I say? People reconstruct the syntax of anomalous utterances.

Authors:  Iva Ivanova; Holly P Branigan; Janet F McLean; Albert Costa; Martin J Pickering
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 2.331

10.  Syntactic priming during sentence comprehension: evidence for the lexical boost.

Authors:  Matthew J Traxler; Kristen M Tooley; Martin J Pickering
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.