Literature DB >> 14597119

Matrix effect in bio-analysis of illicit drugs with LC-MS/MS: influence of ionization type, sample preparation, and biofluid.

Riet Dams1, Marilyn A Huestis, Willy E Lambert, Constance M Murphy.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present work was to evaluate the synergistic effect of ionization type, sample preparation technique, and bio-fluid on the presence of matrix effect in quantitative liquid chromatography (LC)-MS/MS analysis of illicit drugs by post-column infusion experiments with morphine (10-microg/mL solution). Three bio-fluids (urine, oral fluid, and plasma) were pretreated with four sample preparation procedures [direct injection, dilution, protein precipitation, solid-phase extraction (SPE)] and analyzed by both LC-electrospray ionization (ESI)-MS/MS and LC-atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI)-MS/MS. Our results indicated that both ionization types showed matrix effect, but ESI was more susceptible than APCI. Sample preparation could reduce (clean up) or magnify (pre-concentrate) matrix effect. Residual matrix components were specific to each bio-fluid and interfered at different time points in the chromatogram. We evaluated matrix effect in an early stage of method development and combined optimal ionization type and sample preparation technique for each bio-fluid. Simple dilution of urine was sufficient to allow for the analysis of the analytes of interest by LC-APCI-MS/MS. Acetonitrile protein precipitation provided both sample clean up and concentration for oral fluid analysis, while SPE was necessary for extensive clean up of plasma prior to LC-APCI-MS/MS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14597119     DOI: 10.1016/S1044-0305(03)00574-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 1044-0305            Impact factor:   3.109


  10 in total

1.  Effect of the sample matrix on the determination of indinavir in human urine by HPLC with turbo ion spray tandem mass spectrometric detection.

Authors:  I Fu; E J Woolf; B K Matuszewski
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.935

2.  Mechanistic investigation of ionization suppression in electrospray ionization.

Authors:  R King; R Bonfiglio; C Fernandez-Metzler; C Miller-Stein; T Olah
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 3.  Recent and future developments of liquid chromatography in pesticide trace analysis.

Authors:  E Hogendoorn; P van Zoonen
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 4.759

4.  Quantitative screening and matrix effect studies of drug discovery compounds in monkey plasma using fast-gradient liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Y Hsieh; M Chintala; H Mei; J Agans; J M Brisson; K Ng; W A Korfmacher
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 5.  Progress of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in clinical and forensic toxicology.

Authors:  Pierre Marquet
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.681

6.  LC-atmospheric pressure chemical ionization-MS/ MS analysis of multiple illicit drugs, methadone, and their metabolites in oral fluid following protein precipitation.

Authors:  Riet Dams; Constance M Murphy; Robin E Choo; Willy E Lambert; Andre P De Leenheer; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Investigation of matrix effects in bioanalytical high-performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometric assays: application to drug discovery.

Authors:  Hong Mei; Yunsheng Hsieh; Cymbylene Nardo; Xiaoying Xu; Shiyong Wang; Kwokei Ng; Walter A Korfmacher
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Quantitation of SR 27417 in human plasma using electrospray liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry: A study of ion suppression.

Authors:  D L Buhrman; P I Price; P J Rudewiczcor
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.109

9.  The effects of sample preparation methods on the variability of the electrospray ionization response for model drug compounds.

Authors: 
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  Simultaneous measurement of cocaine, cocaethylene, their metabolites, and "crack" pyrolysis products by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  E J Cone; M Hillsgrove; W D Darwin
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 8.327

  10 in total
  51 in total

1.  Simultaneous determination by UPLC-MS/MS of seven bioactive compounds in rat plasma after oral administration of Ginkgo biloba tablets: application to a pharmacokinetic study.

Authors:  Wen-ping Wang; Na Liu; Qian Kang; Pei-pei Du; Yi Lan; Bo-chen Zhao; Yan-yan Chen; Qing Zhang; Hui Li; Ye-wen Zhang; Qing Wu
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.066

2.  Disposition of ketamine and norketamine in hair after a single dose.

Authors:  Ping Xiang; Qiran Sun; Baohua Shen; Min Shen
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Differential Mobility Spectrometry-Mass Spectrometry (DMS-MS) in Radiation Biodosimetry: Rapid and High-Throughput Quantitation of Multiple Radiation Biomarkers in Nonhuman Primate Urine.

Authors:  Zhidan Chen; Stephen L Coy; Evan L Pannkuk; Evagelia C Laiakis; Albert J Fornace; Paul Vouros
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 3.109

4.  Evaluation of matrix effect and chromatography efficiency: new parameters for validation of method development.

Authors:  Eduard Rogatsky; Daniel Stein
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2005-09-28       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 5.  Modern instrumental methods in forensic toxicology.

Authors:  Michael L Smith; Shawn P Vorce; Justin M Holler; Eric Shimomura; Joe Magluilo; Aaron J Jacobs; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.367

6.  Application of bioconjugation chemistry on biosensor fabrication for detection of TAR-DNA binding protein 43.

Authors:  Yifan Dai; Chunlai Wang; Liang-Yuan Chiu; Kevin Abbasi; Blanton S Tolbert; Geneviève Sauvé; Yun Yen; Chung-Chiun Liu
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 10.618

7.  Direct Analysis of Amphetamine Stimulants in a Whole Urine Sample by Atmospheric Solids Analysis Probe Tandem Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Eduardo J Crevelin; Fernanda H Salami; Marcela N R Alves; Bruno S De Martinis; Antônio E M Crotti; Luiz A B Moraes
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 8.  Biological Matrix Effects in Quantitative Tandem Mass Spectrometry-Based Analytical Methods: Advancing Biomonitoring.

Authors:  Parinya Panuwet; Ronald E Hunter; Priya E D'Souza; Xianyu Chen; Samantha A Radford; Jordan R Cohen; M Elizabeth Marder; Kostya Kartavenka; P Barry Ryan; Dana Boyd Barr
Journal:  Crit Rev Anal Chem       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 6.535

9.  Utilizing Internal Standard Responses to Assess Risk on Reporting Bioanalytical Results from Hemolyzed Samples.

Authors:  Eliza N Fung; Anne-Françoise Aubry; Alban Allentoff; Qin C Ji
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 4.009

10.  Unexpected behavior of diastereomeric ions in the GasPhase: a stimulus for pondering on ee measurements by ESI-MS.

Authors:  Caterina Fraschetti; Antonello Filippi; Maria Elisa Crestoni; Tadashi Ema; Maurizio Speranza
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 3.109

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.