Literature DB >> 14596305

Comparison of dose calculation algorithms with Monte Carlo methods for photon arcs.

James C L Chow1, Eugene Wong, Jeff Z Chen, Jake Van Dyk.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to seek an accurate and efficient method to calculate the dose distribution of a photon arc. The algorithms tested include Monte Carlo, pencil beam kernel (PK), and collapsed cone convolution (CCC). For the Monte Carlo dose calculation, EGS4/DOSXYZ was used. The SRCXYZ source code associated with the DOSXYZ was modified so that the gantry angle of a photon beam would be sampled uniformly within the arc range about an isocenter to simulate a photon arc. Specifically, photon beams (6/18 MV, 4 x 4 and 10 x 10 cm2) described by a phase space file generated by BEAM (MCPHS), or by two point sources with different photon energy spectra (MCDIV) were used. These methods were used to calculate three-dimensional (3-D) distributions in a PMMA phantom, a cylindrical water phantom, and a phantom with lung inhomogeneity. A commercial treatment planning system was also used to calculate dose distributions in these phantoms using equivalent tissue air ratio (ETAR), PK and CCC algorithms for inhomogeneity corrections. Dose distributions for a photon arc in these phantoms were measured using a RK ion chamber and radiographic films. For homogeneous phantoms, the measured results agreed well (approximately 2% error) with predictions by the Monte Carlo simulations (MCPHS and MCDIV) and the treatment planning system for the 180 degrees and 360 degrees photon arcs. For the dose distribution in the phantom with lung inhomogeneity with a 90 degrees photon arc, the Monte Carlo calculations agreed with the measurements within 2%, while the treatment planning system using ETAR, PK and CCC underestimated or overestimated the dose inside the lung inhomogeneity from 6% to 12%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14596305     DOI: 10.1118/1.1601331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  6 in total

1.  Advantage of 3D volumetric dosemeter in delivery quality assurance of dynamic arc therapy: comparison of pencil beam and Monte Carlo calculations.

Authors:  H-J Shin; J H Song; J-Y Jung; Y-K Kwak; C S Kay; Y-N Kang; B O Choi; H S Jang; S H Son
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Energy Dependence of Measured CT Numbers on Substituted Materials Used for CT Number Calibration of Radiotherapy Treatment Planning Systems.

Authors:  Reza Mahmoudi; Nasrollah Jabbari; Mehdi Aghdasi; Hamid Reza Khalkhali
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Dosimetry of oblique tangential photon beams calculated by superposition/convolution algorithms: a Monte Carlo evaluation.

Authors:  James C L Chow; Runqing Jiang; Michael K K Leung
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Comparison of dose calculations between pencil-beam and Monte Carlo algorithms of the iPlan RT in arc therapy using a homogenous phantom with 3DVH software.

Authors:  Jin Ho Song; Hun-Joo Shin; Chul Seung Kay; Soo-Min Chae; Seok Hyun Son
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Commissioning a fast Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for lung cancer treatment planning.

Authors:  Jeff Craig; Mike Oliver; Adam Gladwish; Matt Mulligan; Jeff Chen; Eugene Wong
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Dosimetry of small bone joint calculated by the analytical anisotropic algorithm: a Monte Carlo evaluation using the EGSnrc.

Authors:  James C L Chow; Runqing Jiang; Amir M Owrangi
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-01-06       Impact factor: 2.102

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.