Literature DB >> 1459564

Graphical displays: implications for divided attention, focused attention, and problem solving.

K B Bennett1, J M Flach.   

Abstract

When completing tasks in complex, dynamic domains observers must consider the relationships among many variables (e.g., integrated tasks) as well as the values of individual variables (e.g., focused tasks). A critical issue in display design is whether or not a single display format can achieve the dual design goals of supporting performance at both types of tasks. We consider this issue from a variety of perspectives. One relevant perspective is the basic research on attention and object perception, which concentrates on the interaction between visual features and processing capabilities. The principles of configurality are discussed, with the conclusion that they support the possibility of achieving the dual design goals. These considerations are necessary but not sufficient for effective display design. Graphic displays map information from a domain into visual features; the tasks to be completed are defined in terms of the domain, not in terms of the visual features alone. The implications of this subtle but extremely important difference are discussed. The laboratory research investigating alternative display formats is reviewed. Much like the attention literature, the results do not rule out the possibility that the dual design goals can be achieved.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1459564     DOI: 10.1177/001872089203400502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Factors        ISSN: 0018-7208            Impact factor:   2.888


  11 in total

Review 1.  An object-oriented taxonomy of medical data presentations.

Authors:  J Starren; S B Johnson
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Evaluation of two new ecological interface approaches for the anesthesia workplace.

Authors:  A Jungk; B Thull; A Hoeft; G Rau
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Ergonomic evaluation of an ecological interface and a profilogram display for hemodynamic monitoring.

Authors:  A Jungk; B Thull; A Hoeft; G Rau
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Guiding Principles for a Pediatric Neurology ICU (neuroPICU) Bedside Multimodal Monitor: Findings from an International Working Group.

Authors:  Zachary M Grinspan; Yonina C Eldar; Daniel Gopher; Amihai Gottlieb; Rotem Lammfromm; Halinder S Mangat; Nimrod Peleg; Steven Pon; Igal Rozenberg; Nicholas D Schiff; David E Stark; Peter Yan; Hillel Pratt; Barry E Kosofsky
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 2.342

5.  GIFIC. A graphical interface for intensive care.

Authors:  M F Lesser
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1994

6.  A re-appraisal of the tri-axial chart for monitoring arterial acid-base values.

Authors:  M Hekking; H J Ulenkate; B Speelberg; M J Van Puyenbroek; H M Goldschmidt; E S Gelsema
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Posture biofeedback increases cognitive load.

Authors:  Jason L Baer; Anita Vasavada; Rajal G Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-02-03

8.  Development of a Wearable Cardiac Monitoring System for Behavioral Neurocardiac Training: A Usability Study.

Authors:  Akib A Uddin; Plinio P Morita; Kevin Tallevi; Kevin Armour; John Li; Robert P Nolan; Joseph A Cafazzo
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 4.773

Review 9.  A Review of the Neuropsychological Dimensions of Tourette Syndrome.

Authors:  Simon Morand-Beaulieu; Julie B Leclerc; Philippe Valois; Marc E Lavoie; Kieron P O'Connor; Bruno Gauthier
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2017-08-18

10.  Does the process map influence the outcome of quality improvement work? A comparison of a sequential flow diagram and a hierarchical task analysis diagram.

Authors:  Lacey Colligan; Janet E Anderson; Henry W W Potts; Jonathan Berman
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.