Literature DB >> 14595175

Single versus multiple dose antibiotic prophylaxis in lumbar disc surgery.

Matthew A Dobzyniak1, Jeffrey S Fischgrund, Steve Hankins, Harry N Herkowitz.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective review.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of preoperative antibiotics alone in preventing wound infections following lumbar diskectomy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: It is well documented that antibiotics given perioperatively reduce the rate of postoperative wound infections in lumbar disc surgery. At our institution, the current protocol for patients undergoing lumbar diskectomy is a single preoperative antibiotic dose. This study was conducted to compare the rate of postoperative wound infection incurred for single versus multiple perioperative antibiotic doses. It was hypothesized that no significant difference in infection rates would be identified.
METHODS: This retrospective chart review compared the rates of postoperative wound infections incurred when single versus multiple perioperative antibiotic doses were given to patients having lumbar laminotomy for herniated discs. The procedures were performed between 1993 and March 1999. There were 434 patients in the multiple dose group and 201 in the single dose group. The multiple dose group received one preoperative and at least three postoperative doses of antibiotics. The single dose group received one preoperative dose of antibiotics. A postoperative infection was deemed present by either clinical diagnosis or culture results. The medical records were reviewed for 6 weeks after surgery for all patients.
RESULTS: There were 5 out of 435 (1.15%) infections in the multiple dose group and 3 out of 201 (1.49%) in the single dose group. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference between the two study groups.
CONCLUSION: These results support the use of single preoperative dose of antibiotics in lumbar disc surgery. This is relevant as many lumbar diskectomy patients are candidates for early hospital discharge. At our institution, no increased risk of infection occurred for the single dose group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14595175     DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000090839.61893.BE

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  5 in total

Review 1.  Is the routine use of systemic antibiotics after spine surgery warranted? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  José Manuel Orenday-Barraza; María José Cavagnaro; Mauricio J Avila; Isabel Martha Strouse; Dara S Farhadi; Aaron Dowell; Naushaba Khan; Pedro Aguilar-Salinas; Robert Ravinsky; Ali A Baaj
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 2.721

2.  Antimicrobial prophylaxis to prevent surgical site infection in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion: 2 doses versus antibiotics till drain removal.

Authors:  Vijay H D Kamath; Jason Pui Yin Cheung; Kin Cheung Mak; Yat Wa Wong; Wai Yuen Cheung; Keith Dip Kei Luk; Kenneth Man Chee Cheung
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Surgical site infections following spine surgery: eliminating the controversies in the diagnosis.

Authors:  Jad Chahoud; Zeina Kanafani; Souha S Kanj
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2014-03-24

4.  Postoperative comparison of the results from use of antibiotic prophylaxis for one and five days among patients undergoing lumbar arthrodesis.

Authors:  Charbel Jacob Júnior; André Camatta de Assis; Romulo Guerra Guimarães; Igor Machado Barbosa; José Lucas Batista Júnior
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2016-05-02

5.  Infection with spinal instrumentation: Review of pathogenesis, diagnosis, prevention, and management.

Authors:  Manish K Kasliwal; Lee A Tan; Vincent C Traynelis
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2013-10-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.